Does Society Influence Technology, Or Vice Versa?

962 Words2 Pages

Development of technology has shaped many areas of our lives: social interaction, education, and medicine. Technology is one of the factors that is constantly pushing us forward; unfortunately, it also carries a higher catastrophic prospect. What we perceive as a Holy Grail of humanity serves to be the one slowly consuming us both mentally and physically. Technology is a double-edged sword, although we are able to wield a weapon, it is able to harm us, as it has with weapon testing. Technology carries the power to reform our societies, and change how we act with one another. This may be leading to our demise as seen with the absence of life elsewhere. Therefore, I believe technological expansions occur outside the realm of human control. On …show more content…

The broad aspect of technology in our daily social lives is to simplify or reduce a task’s load. We create cars so they are able to drive us to places rather than walking. Through the expansion of cellular devices, we have never been as connected as we are today. We are creating automated devices to prolong our connection online. Automated cars are popularized due to human error; many lives are lost in automotive related accidents. Although, this is merely not the only case, we have created automated cars so deaths due to the use of cellular devices while driving decrease drastically. Currently we are facing with more than half a million injuries or deaths because of cellular devices [5]. We tackle not the problem itself but instead find another path that we have yet to walk on. We are letting technology do everything it possibly can, to ensure we stay connected with it. This ties strongly to whether we as humans have the ability to control the expansion of technology. The answer is no, what started as means of convenience, has grown into a battle of how out of touch we can be with …show more content…

Presuming only a small percentage of these stars carry life in their surrounding planets would still result in a great number of extant civilizations. A common brought up theory against the fermi paradox are the presence of great life filters, a point in a civilization’s time in which it is not able to ‘pass’ or survive. The advancement of technology can be one of the great filters of life, a technology so dangerous that it immediately wipes out humanity. This can answer the question of why we may not see life; we as a species, heavily focused on constantly advancing that we do not realize the potential risks, which mask themselves. Creating synthetic A.I may just lead to our own demise by having it see us as means to rise up or creating a weapon so powerful it has the capabilities of wiping life from our entire planet. We have already experienced many instances of when we underestimated the power of our creations, perhaps this may just be our last

Open Document