Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The benedft of introducing sex education in school
Gender education and the effects on children
Co-ed vs single gender education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The benedft of introducing sex education in school
You walk into an average school and you see students learning, listening, and engaging in a lecture. So would it matter if those students were all male or female. Students learn and interact with other students every day. Though, at middle or high school students get distracted and they learn at different paces. They worry about how they are perceived by other students. They don't learn as well. They worry about the opposite gender. These problems can be solved easily. If students were in single gender schools opposed to co-ed schools students would be able to engage in school better.
It has been said that students who are in gender specific schools will develop gender stereotypes. By placing them in a single gender environment, "We are in fact, enhancing sexual stereotyping" (Halpern). However, this is not the case. Students in gender specific schools aren't just around the same students. When they return home, they might go hang out with other students. It's not as if the students are prohibited from meeting with other people of the opposite gender. Therefore, students can't get stereotypes stuck in their head, if they have not been taught them.
Some people think that students in coed schools are just as intelligent as children in single gender schools. Although, this isn't the case. Single gender schools target certain learning strategies pertaining to that specific gender. These tactics help students learn and develop skills effortlessly. Rather than trying to teach one thing two ways they save time by teaching one thing one way. On average, 37% of male students in coed schools score proficient on a state test compared to an 86% in single gender schools (Tricket). This proves that students comprehend to a grea...
... middle of paper ...
...y for tests or focus on extra curicular activities. Plus, They can take the classes they want without being uncomfortable. Making it easier for them to learn what they want to do at an earlier age. They end up receiving a high quality education with the same amount of work put into teaching. Students should be placed in single gender schools because they allow students to engage in schoolbetter. Isn't that the point of education anyway?
Works Cited
"Home Introduction." Home Introduction. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.
Kimmel, Michael, and The Opinions Expressed in This Commentary Are Solely Those of Michael Kimmel. "Don't Segregate Boys and Girls in Classrooms." CNN. Cable News Network, 03 Feb. 2014. Web. 13 Apr. 2014.
"Single-sex Education: The Pros and Cons." GreatSchools. Web. 12 Apr. 2014.
"Study: Single-sex Education Offers No Benefits. Web. 13 Apr. 2014. Sudy
It seems that single-sex education perpetuates gender stereotypes and promotes gender bias among students (Taylor). Gender-separate education requires schools and teachers to create gender-oriented courses, facilities, and learning environment. As a result, sing-sex schools exacerbate sexist attitudes and “feelings of superiority toward women” (Guarisco). It is fair to argue that the best way to achieve gender equality is to promote rather than eliminate interaction among girls and boys. However, girls in the sex-mixed class receive less attention from teachers than boys, which may lead to gender bias. More precisely, boys always have disciplinary issues, such as interruption; teachers have to pay more attention to boys’ behaviors in order to proceed the lecture more smoothly. Girls may feel less important and supportive in male-dominated classes; boys may think that males are smarter and far superior than females. Single-sex schools can address both girls’ and boys’ issues of gender stereotypes directly and accordingly. Male students may be freer to engage in some activities they have not considered before in mixed schools. For example, boys feel pressure to follow some non-macho interests when girls stay around them; however, the all-boys schools eliminate their pressure toward gender stereotyping to pursue music, dance, and drawing. Single-sex schools would help boys explore and develop themselves. Also, girls in sex-separate schools show more confidence and power (Guarisco). They could receive full attention from teachers and express their opinions in science classes without worrying about the boys’ banter. They may realize that they are as important as boys. Hence, both girls and boys can be free from gender stereotypes and benefit from a same-sex learning
If the average adult was asked who they believe is smarter: a boy or a girl, chances are that the answers would be evenly distributed. The unfortunate truth is that girls have an unfair advantage in learning at their schools because of the way that curriculum is set up. In his piece “The Gender Gap at School” David Brooks explains how male students are not given an equal opportunity to maximize their learning potential in school and how we can fix this issue. This is a very concerning issue that if not fixed, could end up destroying future male generations. This trend can be fixed by separating male and female students into different classes, by rewarding students with positive reinforcement, and by teaching different curriculums.
Education was sex segregated for hundreds of years. Men and women went to different schools or were physically and academically separated into “coeducational” schools. Males and females had separate classrooms, separate entrances, separate academic subjects, and separate expectations. Women were only taught the social graces and morals, and teaching women academic subjects was considered a waste of time.
Sending a child to a gender based school, is a very big decision to make. The decision is so big, that looking at what research has to say about the topic could alter one’s decision to send their child to a gender based school. “Educators must apply different approaches in teaching make, and female students” (Gurian). This is said by Gurian, because he also believes that boys and girls learn differently. “Social pressures can be gentler and your child can learn at his own pace” (Kennedy).
Parents choose which school they want their child to go, not only to get a good education but also to be in a safe place. (1) The topic of segregating classes by gender has been discussed for a long time and a lot of research has been done. (2) Schools should not be segregated by gender because kids need to be prepared for the real-world. (3) Young adults need to have an understanding of equality, not just about race, but about gender as well. (4) Also, money is always an issue for families and private, gender-
If we can get through all the regular obstacles throughout the day and still learn, boys and girls can sit in the same classroom and learn. In, “Separate and Unequal”, the author states, “One distinct advantage of the single-sex classroom, though, is the candor with which dating, pregnancy, and gender can be addressed.” In the world we live in today, there is always going to be situations with dating. There are many people who prefer the same sex. Even if you remove boys from the girls, there is still going to be a problem with romance affecting their scholastic
3-the perceptions of gender roles through teachers modeling of sex stereotypes in the classroom. There are fundamental elements of the school environment develop and reinforce inequity: teachers may be unaware of their gender bias; there is a lack of school textbooks and other instructional materials are sex-bias free; and children may interact according to strongly stereotyped gender blueprints.
Why Our District Should Not Have Single Gender Classrooms If our school district has our classrooms becomes Single Gender classrooms all students that go through our schools will not have all the social skills that a student's youth is supposed to give them. Although the opposite gender can be a distractor in class, I do not believe we should have single gender classrooms in our district because Co-ed classrooms prepare students for the real world, Create social skills for both genders, and running two separate programs can become extremely costly. Co-ed classrooms prepare students for real world interaction. If our school district changes classroom styles from co-ed to single gender classrooms, students that come out of the Gilbert Public
In all reality though, segregating schools by the mere importance of our genders, it won’t change very much. “Don’t fix it if it’s not broken.” Although I am against it strongly, not everything about it is all bad. Separating boys and girls in there learning environment can lead to greater achievement in education.
Imagine your life with only members of your gender. Not all the time of course. Just during your school day or even part of your school day. Same sex classrooms would make that imagination your reality. Before you turn down the idea, because god forbid you go a few hours without seeing a cute boy take a moment to learn about all the benefits same sex schooling can provide. Most students are against same sex schools. They want to flirt with the cute guy in math or ask the shy girl in history for a pencil even if they already one. Same sex classrooms provide a multitude of benefits, because they promote better behavior, higher grades, improved self-esteem, and are able to cater to student’s needs.
The teacher tossed a Styrofoam basketball to the outstretched arms of a fifth grade boy. Catching the ball was the incentive for the boys to point out missing conventions in a paragraph. The teacher projected a paragraph on the board with omitted punctuation for the students to add. The other boys in the class watched him as he went to the board to add the missing comma and then tossed the ball back to the teacher. A few seconds later, other arms shot up in the air to point out other missing conventions (Stotsky). A simple incentive of competition for the boys made them enjoy learning and actually got them to participate in class. Although single-sex classrooms can develop stereotypes for both genders, separating boys and girls can be beneficial for the students. Single-sex classes are more effective because they raise test scores, create fewer distractions, and make kids interested in school.
Finally, there is no one sex school is going to be right for every student. There are many advantages and disadvantages mentioned in that essay before. But it's thought all over the world that the coeducation is preferred worldwide. About 90 % of schools all over the world are stuck to co-education. Mixed-sex education has achieved higher success rate. They also graduate students who are settled emotionally and able to deal with the real society. "There are not any dominant blessings for single-sex schools on academic grounds. Studies all over the world have failed to expose any major variations.'' - Academician Alan Smothers, director of education and employment analysis at the University of Buckingham 2011.
The proponents of single-sex education argue that boys and girls have differing needs and that their styles of learning are different. Education which respects personal differences must take this into account. ( Mullins 124) Single-gender schools seem logical, than, to a public that accepts that gender differences are real and likes the idea of expanding choices. (Silv...
There are many reasons that parents, students and administrators look down upon single gender education. One of the largest of these reasons is the issue of stereotypes. According to Kim Gandy, presi...
Single-sex education has shown to be effective in helping students maintain their focus inside the classroom and learn better by doing so. The distraction of the other gender is not present in the classroom environment which enables the students to primarily focus on what they are learning. According to Pahlke's article titled "The effects of Single-Sex Compared With Coeducational Schooling on Mathematics and Science Achievement: Data From Korea", s...