District Attorney Ethical Dilemmas

617 Words2 Pages

In this scenario, I have decided to report the incident to the district attorney. This decision required a lot of information to be thought through carefully. This situation is an ethical dilemma and the decision to go to the district attorney is most rationale option. Every decision that is made requires balancing concerns such as prosecuting the guilty, respecting the rights of the accused, protecting victims all while creating and maintaining a safe community. Though, decision making isn’t the easiest, we can always make the best choice when we think things through and understand the different ways to approach the situation(s).

So, let’s look over what transpired. As of right now the victim of assault and rape is in a coma, around the area of where the crime took place there was a gang of young men who were seen assaulting and threating the people around there. Two members of the gang, age 14, were picked up by two responding officers, both of these minors have pre-existing records for robbery and assault. …show more content…

Not to mention that without evidence to support that they might be the perpetrators the case would be thrown out due to lack of evidence, which would definitely make the police and district attorney look bad, in terms of handling the case. I believe that my partner used an unethical technique against the 14-year-old boys in order to get a confession. This would violate their rights and the ethics of duty (deontology), which is “the normative ethical position that judges the morality of an action based on the actions adherence to a rule or rules. It is sometimes described as duty or obligation or rule -based ethics, because rules bind you to your duty” (). In other words, deontological approach begins with the presumption that any action is inherently right or wrong; an action is right if it respects the rules and wrong if it

More about District Attorney Ethical Dilemmas

Open Document