Difference Between Martin Luther And Ethnocentrism

769 Words4 Pages
There are many things in history in which may relate to one another but have happened in different times and eras. From the begging of Jamestown, to the Salem Witch Trials in Salem, Mass., all things in history have a relation. In this essay, we will be linking Martin Luther, the Protestant Reformation, the Salem Witch Trials, the Puritans, and the term 'ethnocentrism '. While these may seem like they will not connect with each other, but there is always a way to colligate these events in history. First we will talk about Martin Luther. Martin Luther was born on November 10th, 1438 and died February 18th, 1546, but his actions throughout his life leave a mark in the history world. Luther was a Catholic priest and professor of Theology from Germany. He attended the University of Wittenburg, and there, not only did he earn a doctorate, but he also gained "religious enlightenment". He is, to this day, a very influential person of the past and he changed history forever, but why? The answer is the Protestant Reformation. The Protestant…show more content…
While the Puritans left their homelands to get away from "leniency", their attitudes can still be described as ethnocentric, because they disliked and could not tolerate someone else 's faith, they had to find a new home and wanted their own "reformation". One could absolutely say that the Puritans felt holier-thou and better than those of who they were surrounded by in England. Although, another event later in history known as the Salem Witch Trials may not be described as an act of ethnocentrism, it was an circumstance in which not someone 's religion was persecuted or judged, but actual individuals were
Open Document