Difference Between Hanger Steaks And Filet Mignon

632 Words2 Pages

Hanger steaks and filet mignon are two very different cuts of meat. Despite their differences, both can be very flavorful when cooked with the right techniques. In order to determine which is right for you, let's compare them. How do hanger steaks and filet mignon differ? Hanger steaks differ from filet mignon in terms of where they come from on the cow, how they taste and the length of time it takes to cook them. Other differences between the two cuts include price and appearance. For a long time, hanger steaks were reserved solely for restaurant use or were used for making ground beef. It was popular because it offered a similar depth of flavor as more expensive steaks like ribeye but without the high cost. Hanger steaks have a coarse texture and long muscle fibers much like flank steaks. The texture can make them …show more content…

Filet mignon tends to have a mild flavor, unlike hanger steaks that are enjoyed because they deliver a strong beef flavor. The mildness makes this cut ideal for people who do not particularly like steak. Filet mignon is also perfect for anyone who wants their meat lean since it is low in fat. The main reason that filet mignon is prized is its texture, which is extremely tender. How tender? You can cut prime filet mignon with a fork, that's how tender. Where on the steer do you find hanger steaks and filet mignon steaks? The hanger steak is named for the fact that it comes from what is called the hanging tender. The hanging tender is that section of the diaphragm muscle that is connected to the rearmost section of the last rib. It literally hangs from the diaphragm muscle. Filet mignon comes from the small end of the tenderloin, also called the short loin. This cut is found at the back of the animal's rib cage. This is a part of the steer that is not exercised, so it does not get toughened. Is one easier to grill than the

Open Document