Dental Hygienist Case Study

658 Words2 Pages

Registered dental hygienist Farrah Allison started her new occupation. She saw three clients with no problems. The fourth was a new client, named Lisa Boertlein. Farrah used the electronic caries detector with ease. Farrah charted only one reading that showed a carious lesion and noted several on the chart which were borderline readings. Upon examination, Dr. Oliver stated to the patient, that she had a numerous number of teeth with carious lesions that needs to be restored. The dental hygienist now faces two ethical dilemmas; non-maleficence and veracity. At this point, the action that Farrah should immediately take is; talk to the dentist in private regarding why those teeth that you examined has caries, but the electronic caries detector showed only one reading. Another action that Farrah could take is to accept and adhere to what the dentist recommended …show more content…

Oliver’s eyes, he is determined to restore all possible caries. In this situation, the treatment will benefit the dental clinic such as more income coming from the patient and the insurance companies. Ms. Boertlein will be financially exhausted paying for the co-pays and other financial obligations that her dental insurance does not cover. Dr. Oliver is using sound judgement and professional experience to make a critical decision and thus he must stand with his ethical decision. The dentist has reached the most advanced level of moral reasoning to make his decision to in treating Ms. Boertlein. Kohlberg’s emphasized that “the older and more educated individuals tended to behave more morally” (Kimbrough-Walls). Farrah was really anxious and excited about her new occupation. It pays well, and all the dental instruments are state of the art and Dr. Oliver had the same beliefs and philosophies as she did. Farrah could be avoided this situation, by talking to the dentist and asking his professional opinion why he stated, “there are a significant number of

Open Document