Defensive Pessimism Essay

1167 Words3 Pages

To further understand defensive pessimism and self-handicapping, it is relevant to compare and contrast the two cognitive strategies’ motivational forces.

It is suggested that achievement motives such as need for achievement (desire to approach success) and fear of failure (desire to avoid failure) are viewed crucial because they influence the kind of self-regulatory tools people utilize in achievement settings (Elliot, 1999; Elliot & McGregor, 1999), most likely including cognitive strategies such as defensive pessimism and self-handicapping. Hence, achievement motives play a factor for people’s preference of cognitive strategies. A person who value recognition, success, and power might use a different cognitive strategy applicable in attaining success. Meanwhile, a person who wants to avoid failure and just want to protect his/her self-esteem from the negative outcomes of failure may choose a different cognitive strategy.

The concept of domain-general approach and avoidance temperaments is just recently introduced by Elliot and Thrash (2002). These two temperaments represent broad neurobiological sensitivities to positive and negative stimuli. Moreover, they are posited to be similar with Gray’s BAS and BIS. Thus, BAS and BIS are regarded as core components of the two temperaments (Elliot & Thrash, 2002). In addition, it is suggested that they are direct importation of RST.

Similar with achievement motives, general temperaments are not regarded to have a direct effect on achievement-relevant outcomes. On the other hand, approach and avoidance temperaments are viewed as important because they influence people toward certain kinds of self-regulation in achievement settings (Elliot, 1999; Elliot & Thrash, 2001), most likely ...

... middle of paper ...

...g from an (ethnic background) family, if you get a good mark, they’ll expect you to do the same thing.” In the Philippine context, it is possible that this applies to Filipino children as well. Filipino children once they get really good grades, parents will tend to expect the same next time. It is undeniable that Filipino children experience this pressure on their part as well that will lead them to use a positive or negative approach in fulfilling these expectations.

According to other participants who are high on defensive pessimism, thinking more negatively is a good motivation for them to take necessary actions. Also, one participant added: “If you’re negative you stress more, and a bit of stress is good.” Hence, it is deemed that this kind of pessimism encourages the individual to move forward. It can be used as a tool to fulfil their performance needs.

Open Document