Deborah Payne Essay

769 Words2 Pages

Deborah C. Payne is a dramaturg and an associate professor for the department of Literature at the American University in Washington, D.C. She has published other works regarding the Restoration Period such as The Cambridge Companion to Restoration Theatre (2000) and Four Restoration Libertine Plays (2005).

Her essay on Restoration actresses defines them as both reified objects and emergent professionals. In fact, Payne suggests that these are “mutually defining terms” (1995: 17). Her essay highlights how these actresses assume this definition as they had to present themselves in such a way that would allow them a place in theatre’s, and society’s, market economy. There have been many articles and essays discussing actresses in the Restoration …show more content…

While these “critics are right to show how objectification undoubtably diminished actresses” (1995: 15) Payne wants to draw the readers attention to how the “increasingly pronounced sense of the visual [meant that] objectification simultaneously amplified actresses, situating them at the next nexus of power” (16). This idea of a reclamation of power is similar to the driving force of neofeminism: the idea of owning your femininity and female body. The actuality of a Restoration society assuming “that a woman who displayed herself on the public stage was probably a whore” (Howe 1992: 32) draws parallels with the public’s response to Miley Cyrus at the VMAs in 2013: The Parents Council said her performance was over-sexualised (Lombardi, 2013). There are parallels between using the female body as provocative imagery in both Modern and Restoration media, the latter of which Payne doesn’t shy away from …show more content…

While most of these critics seem to agree with a more fetishised analysis, Laura J. Rosenthal suggests that this “whore representation […] takes on a life of it own, independent of the references to the women themselves” (1993: 4). This is highlighted in both Rosenthal’s and Payne’s awareness of Robert Gould and his plight against the actresses of the Restoration stage. Payne’s conclusion that “recent criticism has done more to advance [Gould’s opinion] than he ever managed during his own time” (1995: 22-23) shows how dominant male criticism can be when it comes to female objectification. Payne sheds light on how we apply historiographical justification to some works that are blatantly lampoon in nature. There is nothing wrong with adding critical value to this source but only if one is aware of the context surrounding these

Open Document