The serious potential of transgressing gender roles is explored through Rosalind's ability to subvert the limitations that society imposes on her as a woman (Howard 221) and gain power through masculine identity. Her transgressing of gender boundaries permits her to escape the restrictive system of male patriarchy that is Duke Frederick's reign, take control of her destiny, and initiate courtship.
Women of today are not the women of yesterday. Women have undergone a theatrical transformation which makes them bold, independent, and free-spirited beings. A voice that was once suppressed no longer can be tamed; this is illustrated through the rise of both male and female playwrights who continue to reinvent the role of women as more than “man’s other”. In her book, “Modern Drama by Women, 1880s-1930s: An International Anthology,” author Katherine Kelly references a quote by scholar Carrie Chapman Catt, that beautifully frames the transformative state women have undergone. According to Chapman: “Women are organizing, speaking, working … [and] it is now a crucial time, when our Western help may give impetus and permanence to the movement of Eastern women, and when delay may mean a much longer continued oppression of women” (Kelly, 1). In light of this, gender identities and stereotypes that previously mandated how women should: act, look, talk, and even socially interact with others are unmasked. This is depicted through, Sarah Raul’s, In the Next Room, which exemplifies the ideology of a “new women” through the characterization of Catherine Givings— a woman who learns how to reject societies definition of what it means to be a woman in relation to her sexual identity. Henceforth, throughout this essay I will examine sexuality within the context of the Victorian Era as it paralleled with In the Next Room; furthermore, I will analyze how Raul breaks down gender roles and gender representations through the techniques of characterization and staging.
Feminism is a critique of the prevailing male-dominated social norm that seeks to change this norm and therefore is the platform from which to change its domination in theater. Dolan enumerates three segments of American feminism: liberal, cultural or radical, and materialist. She credits liberal feminism with the bolstering of female visibility and involvement in theater and acknowledges the women-affirming aspects of cultural feminism, but she finds them both flawed and unsuitable for an effective attack on the male domination of theater.
Amy Chaffee wrote Your Mother’s Vagina in response to the hesitation she observed throughout her life concerning the discussion of women’s reproductive health. She took her show on an international tour during the summer of 2016, performing in Antwerp, Brussels, Dublin, Edinburgh, Ghent, and Hollywood. Talkbacks were held after each performance, during which audiences reacted in distinctly different ways to the content of the play. I argue that although the government gives society the freedom of expression through the arts, the laws and regulations in place regarding particular subject matter greatly shape how audiences react to that material when presented through theatrical works. Within this paper, I will specifically focus on the ways
In Anatomy of Criticism, author Northrop Frye writes of the low mimetic tragic hero and the society in which this hero is a victim. He introduces the concept of pathos saying it “is the study of the isolated mind, the story of how someone recognizably like ourselves is broken by a conflict between the inner and outer world, between imaginative reality and the sort of reality that is established by a social consensus” (Frye 39). The hero of Hannah W. Foster’s novel, The Coquette undoubtedly suffers the fate of these afore mentioned opposing ideals. In her inability to confine her imagination to the acceptable definitions of early American female social behavior, Eliza Wharton falls victim to the ambiguity of her society’s sentiments of women’s roles. Because she attempts to claim the freedom her society superficially advocates, she is condemned as a coquette and suffers the consequences of exercising an independent mind. Yet, Eliza does not stand alone in her position as a pathetic figure. Her lover, Major Sanford -- who is often considered the villain of the novel -- also is constrained by societal expectations and definitions of American men and their ambition. Though Sanford conveys an honest desire to make Eliza his wife, society encourages marriage as a connection in order to advance socially and to secure a fortune. Sanford, in contrast to Eliza, suffers as a result of adhering to social expectations of a male’s role. While Eliza suffers because she lives her life outside of her social categorization and Sanford falls because he attempts to maneuver and manipulate the system in which he lives, both are victims of an imperfect, developing, American society.
The book A Woman’s War is the story of professional and personal journey of the Navy’s first African-American female intelligence officer named Gail Harris. It applies several theories and concepts of feminism in which the reader scan be seen throughout the whole book. This paper provides the existing concepts and theories applied to analyze the selected text from the book.
The deviated depiction of female protagonists from normalized gender binaries in The Things They Carried solidifies the masculine domination of war, and also uproots any possibility of male acceptance of the women that dare to test the masculine protocol casted on America by its own soldiers.
As an aspiring musical theater performer, I have noticed many dynamics between people of both genders and various sexual identities. While the musical theater world and its participants are generally extremely liberal, it is fascinating to observe gender relations in the context of rehearsing for a show. As reflected in the readings "Nickel and Dimed" by Barbara Ehrenreich and "Women and Men" from "Nisa" by Marjorie Shostak, it is clear that men and women are not treated equally in most facets of life. However, people of all genders and sexual identities are treated the same in the world of musical theater since. Perhaps this is because there is more sexual diversity in the field and in general, males, especially heterosexual ones, are the minority in terms of population both on stage and on the production staff.
Theatre is an art form that has been shared across cultures for hundreds of years. This art form is extremely versatile in the types of plays, such as comedic, tragedy, and many other genres. Although theatre is thought of a form of entertainment, playwrights have seized the opportunity to inject political opinions into the play to inform the audience about present issues in their lives. Issues that playwrights have incorporated into plays have included stories that people may not be ready to hear but it encourages the audience to look inside themselves and assess their moral standing on certain issues. One subject that has been incorporated into many plays throughout the last century is women’s issues. These plays have challenged the way women
Although Dollimore's comment about the absence of the prostitutes holds true for the written text of the play, twentieth century theatrical productions of Measure for Measure have largely tended to fill this void by granting the prostitutes a concrete physical presence on the stage. It might be argued that, by giving this neglected and exploited female population a theatrical incarnation, a performance of the play draws attention to the plight of these women and thereby accomplishes some aspects of a feminist agenda. However, a detailed review of the recent Anglo-American stage history of Measure for Measure reveals that the specific way in which prostitutes are embodied and employed in a given production determines the extent to which the production constitutes a feminist appropriation of the text.