Damned Lies And Statistics Summary

1675 Words4 Pages

Damned Lies and Statistics is a book concerning statistics by Joel Best, it was first published in 2001. This work focused on many examples of erroneous statistics used to sway the consumer about social problems and issues that affect public policy. This work identified the use corrupt statistics, their production, dissemination by the media and authorities. Common errors, deception, and misuse of statistics were demonstrated. All aspects of our lives can be swayed by statistics and if the information is tainted so is the potential that our perceptions and views will be negatively altered. Medicine, public health, social issues, finance and all areas of our lives can be falsely influenced by false statistics. Statistics are in the eye …show more content…

Best points out that many are innumerate and do not understand numbers. Numbers the bigger they are they more difficult they are to engage(Best,2001). When reviewing research, it usually is easy to find differing points of views. Additionally, research and statistics can be injected from one hypothesis to another. Research used for economic theory can be transposed to criminal theory, even though the intent of the original research was something completely different. Statistics can be cited by the author or presenter without them ever disclosing their true intent, therefore, considering the source may have some merit. Great work is published next to questionable, and some work was pertinent in its time period but now is completely irrelevant. Best gives an example of a nineteenth-century bishop who used hyped statistics to cause social reform against prostitution. The bishop said there fewer Methodists than prostitutes, elevating the number of 10,000 to as much as 50,000 in New York City. The police at that time counted 1,223 prostitutes (Best,2001). Providing inflated statistics is common, numbers get people’s attention. This heightens data from the bishop prompted New York City to attempt to count the prostitutes. Perhaps one safeguard in judging numbers knows multiple sources of data. Not only is it important to share what we know, and search for other …show more content…

Serial killer’s murders were overstated, and death of women by anorexia was inflated (Best,2001) many expert testimonies, published work, and social reform advocacy relies on faulty statistics. When we hear numbers somehow, it offers credibility and facts are hardly ever facts. Sometimes they are not valid opinions. Probably what is most enlightening is that we are swayed by numbers, as Best points outs this may be because of our lack of statistical sophistication. Do the statistics given by the media at large genuinely represent society? Reliable statistics are based on real data, distinct rational criteria and measurements and accurate sampling

Open Document