Cultural Ecology And Environmental Anthropology

1796 Words4 Pages

The anthropological studies of Cultural Ecology and Environmental Anthropology represents differing schools of thoughts when it comes to understanding the “making” of “culture”. Nevertheless, both Cultural Ecology and Environmental Anthropology implement the ideology of “nature”, consisting facets of landscape, geography, and the environment as the focal methodology to investigate the construction of what we know as “culture”. In this case, pioneers of Cultural Ecology such as Leslie White develop their understanding of how the physical environment directly affects the production of cultural systems and its adaptive strategies through technology advancements (White 1943: pg. 335). On the other hand, advocates of Environmental Anthropology …show more content…

343-347). To understand this hierarchical progression, White suggested that the technological component is the determinant factor that leads to social organization and develop adaptive ideologies of individuals in the group to better survive in their environment (White 1943: pg. 343-347). For example, White would suggest that cultural beliefs, practices and even societal roles can be ascertained through how a particular society build the material means of a house through the invention of technology such as “the balloon frame” or the type of wood they use to build house pillars (Cronon 1991: pg 46 -54). As opposed to White’s materialist approach, Julian Steward’s idea of Cultural Ecology was influenced by Boas’ idealist approach, introducing the idea of how human thoughts and ideologies are the determinant factor on the ways they became adaptive towards their environment. This can be examined through the potlatch tradition practiced by the natives of Pacific Coast, where distributing their goods and belongings as their cultural traditions were encouraged amongst people in the group (Orlove 1980: pg. 237). In this case, Steward would suggest that potlatch traditions were developed through mutual ideologies amongst people in the group to …show more content…

Based on the premise of Leslie White’s ideas, the relationship between the production of “culture” and what we know as “nature” seemed to be reduced and understood into one strict formula addressing the utilization of technology onto environment as the independent variable, where the production of cultural materials, beliefs, practices, were derived from this particular factor (Wardlow 2015: Lecture Notes). This is a flawed argument, because it tends to disregard and ignore facets of human free-will, and their cultural ideas that may have contributed into progressing their skills to adapt to their environment and produce cultural materials, beliefs and practices in the first place. Moreover, White’s hierarchical progression of favoring technology as the foundation of cultural progression, and imposing categories such as technology, social and ideology as separate domains gives a false differentiation and disregard their possibilities of influencing one another (Wardlow 2015: Lecture Notes). Similar critique was given towards Julian Steward’s Cultural Ecology perspective, as the idea of cultural practices and beliefs being constructed solely to adapt to their respective environment and judge on its efficiency to determine the cultural progression is

More about Cultural Ecology And Environmental Anthropology

Open Document