Critical Thinking Analysis

To disagree is within everyone’s capability. To do the act, in the most objective processes, is much more difficult: the mind, in all of its grandeur, still is flawed. Thus, we must reconsider our perspectives and our preconceived notions.

People are subject to their own biases. Although perspectives vary between the scientific and religious communities, the manner in which people respond to new ideas is identical: they will intuitively reject the concept if it does not adhere to the principles they already uphold. Predominantly, people’s responses are not totally due to objective reasoning, but rather, are derived from methods of rationalization based on personal worldviews and experiences. The foundation of knowledge is acquired through

By virtue of their rapport, they surround themselves with people who would justify the beliefs regardless of its truth value. This promotes an ingroup with resemblance to an echo chamber: when one person says something, everyone else agrees wholeheartedly. However, this becomes a consequence to all people involved, for blind acceptance and negligence for counterpoints dissuade critical thinking. No one learns anything new, and no one improves oneself. Especially with erroneous statements, neither the speaker nor the people in the group would realize the mistake. They would further the falsehood not only amongst themselves but also to others who are willing to listen; those who attempt to refute the statements would be shunned. The spiral of ignorance would, therefore, grow and

Like all other things, evidence – physical, testimonial, documentary – can sometimes be manipulated or misconstrued. To be able to fully realize the situation, one must consider how evidence is presented. It is significant to bear in mind people’s partiality, non-sequiturs, and usage of logical fallacies: proof is delineated to fit another person’s agenda. Hence, one must read between the lines of evidence to find unbiased information. Beyond the tangible data, one needs to recognize one’s own proclivities. People ought to consider what they are predisposed to think and what prejudices they may hold: these influences may elicit negative inclinations. One should not fear the repercussions of being different or of thinking critically. Diverging from norms is what fuels epiphanies, but it requires audacity and courage against society’s precepts. For the world to propel itself forward, its fundamental structure must be built by avant