Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
importance of theatre in society
theatre in changing the society
character development in shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: importance of theatre in society
Extra Credit: Reading
1. What character(s), issue(s), or idea(s) in this play script seemed relevant to your life or to the life of someone you know? Why?
The character Cookie seems very similar to one of my neighbors. My neighbor has a back injury, ironically just like Cookie. Their personalities are quite similar. For example, they are both outgoing, outspoken, and unique. They both seem to talk about thing one minute and, then completely change topics the next minute. They are both considered the life of the party. They both keep the party going and alive. Those are the reasons why I automatically though about my neighbor when I was reading about Cookie. Another connection I made from the play to my life was the whole party scene of the play. The play shows many different characters with very
…show more content…
Describe your overall response to the play script. What did you enjoy or dislike about the plot, characters, language, and dialogue, etc.? Why?
I honestly did not like how messy the conversations between the characters was written. It seemed every time the characters were talking made no sense. They were talking about irrelevant topics. Then, they were talking about one thing and, then a second later they were talking about something else. It was amusing though, how funny the characters acted. However, it was just hard to keep focus on what the characters were talking about. The plot aspect of the play was interesting. I enjoy reading mystery material. Throughout the play I was trying to find out what had happened to Charley and Myra. Overall, it was a good reading. The plot was interesting, the characters were amusing, and the ending was suspenseful. My only critic was that some of the conversations of the characters were irrelevant to the main plot of the play. Those irrelevant conversations was a big distractions on the main point of the play.
4. What do you think the playwright would like us to think, believe, or discuss after we finish reading the scrip?
Not knowing what this play was about, I went to go see it Wednesday after noon at Holyoke Community College in the Leslie Phillips Theater. I had many mixed emotions about this play. I thought some parts were very funny, but others were a little uncomfortable because of some racia...
created the play as a comedy, showing how the world might be in the times of the
I think I agree with how the play was written. I believe it was written to relay a message to its readers on relationships and how they can explode in a fast manner. For example, the relationship that Jim and Dave had was ruined because on girl named Daisy. And because of her talking to both men it caused Jim to be considered guilty
characters. But the theme and conflict that is most exemplified in this play would have to be jealousy.
... a dynamic talent his interpretation of a distinguish business man who attribute himself, savvy with money and his trademark with finances, who completely overcomes the poverty he was born into was excellent. Although his betrayal of Yermolai was great there were a few moments in the play that I thought he over acted on but his overall performance was wonderful? It was almost unrecognizable. The cast of the play was so prepared there were almost no noticeable mistakes. It was unclear in the second act to me for a while what was exactly going on. The transition while they were speaking in the orchard just seems to be a little confusing and somewhat rambling. I think it did not have much to do with the play direction. The end, however, pulled it all together for me to better understand each Act over all this play was enjoyable and a play I could watch again.
meanings along with what is going on in the plot of the play, it is
My least favorite aspect of this play was the ending. The ending confused me and was anticlimactic. It was not funny and not entertaining at all.
Everything was well played and the sound effects did go with each scene. There were some parts where the characters would interact with the audience (i.e. Music). I thought that was creative. Some plays don’t interact with the audience making the play serious and formal. The costumes the characters were wearing were also creative. Changing the costumes is changing their character. The change in costume aids in helping tell the story by knowing what is going on with what character. I liked how all of them at one point played a woman which I found to be hilarious. There were only 4 actors who covered all of the other character. Each actor played more than 3 characters throughout the play which shows that they were able to change emotions and plots very
reach into the ideas and themes of the play so we will have a good
Overall I felt that because of the way the characters were, they made each play far more interesting. I think that is Catherine didn’t show any signs of developing illness that her father had, the play wouldn’t have kept the readers on edge. With Christopher I thought that showing he had some form of illness from the very beginning made things much more interesting. I thought that because of his illness, it made the story much more entertaining and kept me interested in what was going
the play. A very prominent theme in the play is that of Jealousy and how lots of the characters in
Overall this production was very interesting and well performed. It was somewhat enjoyable to the audience, there were times of boringness but the comedy kept the play interesting. The director did a great job of putting everything together and as a result everything was on point. The only thing to say that would better the play is to make the play more interesting to the audience so that the audience does not get tired of watching.
In the section of the play I have been asked to analyse, I think the
When you read this play, take special care to remember the difference between the work of a playwright and that of a novelist. Novelists may imagine their audience as an individual with book in band, but a playwright writes with a theater full of people in mind. Playwrights know that the script is just the blueprint from which actors, producers, stagehands, musicians, scenic designers, make-up artists, and costumers begin. You will need to use an extra measure of imagination to evaluate this play before you see the Goodman production.
...ith the lack of closure the author has paved many paths, making one unable to give a proper retelling of the play due to various interpretations. The play has also slyly inserted a philosophy on human life, the uncertainty and how it is a major part of human life is portrayed through this play. All these characteristic together make this play a very good play, it makes one want to live forever as to see what future generations would interpret the play as. In conclusion, this text is written to make the readers think and participate as active members in the reading of the play.