Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A summary about the constitutional convention
Constitutional conventions essay
Short essay of constitutional convention
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A summary about the constitutional convention
The first thing I have learned from the role play Constitutional Convention, is that the first discussions are very important. I am certain that the preliminary discussions are important because they give understanding between factions, help other members stay on the same page, and because that is when thoughts of motions are to be created. The discussions between different groups help other groups make deals, and help them understand the needs that other groups have. If the factions were not to have discussions before the voting, then when making motions, people would have to make the motions hoping others would agree. While by talking with other groups, you can discover the other groups needs. Another reason why the discussions are important is because the discussions before the actual making of the motions assure that at least one faction would …show more content…
One of the lessons that I have learned, is that you have to consider on what other groups want and do not want. If you do not do this, then when you try to make a deal, they may turn it down. Although if you do plan of this, then you can persuade them with other wants or create a different deal with other factions. Another lesson that I have learned is that you have to plan on when groups actually turn down a deal. During the convention I also noticed that when you plan for this, you can make other deals you can benefit from so that you can get the same things out of the original deal. Some other lesson that I learned from this experience, is that to have a strong argument, the ability to reiterate your statement is needed. By doing this, persuading others in controversy could be easier. These lessons are important to me because in the future they can be used for different persuasion methods and that it has given me insight on what might have happened during the actual Constitutional
You may be thinking how did the constitution stop tyranny? Well we have the answer. Let's start of with what tyranny means, that a leader or king abuses their power. How did the constitution guard against tyranny? Well they abuse their power bad deeds. The constitution guard against tyranny in these four ways. Federalism, separation of power, checks and balances, and small states vs. large states.
This Convention was about the Articles of Confederation and went through it and debated on how to make revisions to it. John Rutledge was ahead of many committees even the committee that drafted the first version of constitution.
The main one is, if I didn’t I couldn’t hold up my head in town, I couldn’t represent this country in the legislature.” (Lee 100).... ... middle of paper ...
The 1787 Constitutional Convention was paramount in unifying the states after the Revolutionary War. However, in order to do so, the convention had to compromise on many issues instead of addressing them with all due haste. This caused the convention to leave many issues unresolved. Most notably were the issues of slavery, race, secession, and states’ rights. Through the Civil War and the Reconstruction, these issues were resolved, and in the process the powers of the federal government were greatly expanded.
The constitution establish major governing institutions, assign institution’s power, place explicit and implicit control on power granted. All this gives the political legitimacy. The U.S constitution gives the base model for state constitution for Texas.
How Democratic is the American Constitution? by Robert A. Dahl is an interesting novel questioning the reliability of the American Constitution. Dahl brings up many interesting points and queries in the novel that really strike a chord with anyone who has had similar thoughts before, including me. His main first argument stating that the Constitution is essentially outdated is what caught my attention the most, with his argument that the Constitution needs to be more democratic coming as a close second. These are the two main arguments I’ll be focusing on as they’re ones that I’ve thought about prior to reading this book in previous government related classes.
The political climate during the Texas constitutional convention in 1875 was mainly characterized by the determination of Democrats to undo the effects that had been brought about by the radical constitution of 1969. When Democrats regained power in 1873 from Governor Edmund J. Davis, they prioritized the drafting of a new constitution for the people of Texas.
“Every right implies a responsibility; Every [sic.] opportunity, an obligation, Every [sic.] possession, a duty,” quoted by John D. Rockefeller, an American industrialist. Since America is a superpower, where else would this be more true? For the continuous success of the United States, it's important for all citizens to give back in some sort of way so our society can function. This calls for the use of our individual strengths to produce something we can all enjoy together. It's not just about the survival of America, but the innovation, and evolution of our country.
Although the Constitution was put in place to protect the people, there is much debate about the strength and weaknesses of the Constitution. If you lived in this era, would you for or against the Constitution? The pros and cons of the Constitution seem to be based on geographical location, with the primary goal being breaking free of Britain control and establishing a functioning government that we all can live by. The boundaries of slavery stood in the midst of forming a more perfect union. Creating a more perfect union had its’ own agenda such as setting boundaries for state governments, securities, commerce, and the welfare of the people. In establishing the Constitution, it was decided that three branches government should be in powers
The Constitution is the skeleton of the United States. Nothing the United States does goes against what our leaders have interpreted The constitution to stand for, but interpretation is subjective. Without a standard lens to view this historical and legal document with, it is virtually worthless. The three primary viewpoints each have appealing characteristics to them. I think a mix between all three interpretations is the most sensible way to look at The Constitution, but Constructionism should be the predominant perspective on The Constitution. In interpreting the Constitution, Americans should consider the frame of society, but view The Constitution as a document that means what the founding fathers intended for it to be, and when all else fails, interpret the language exactly as it is written.
I begin with a simple premise. The Constitution was divinely inspired. It is based upon truths and principles of God set forth by foreordained men. The Lord desired a nation in which liberty, especially freedom of religion, was a right ensured under law. He inspired men penning the document to include in it certain protections.The existence of these safeguards would create a far better framework for the Restoration of the Gospel than could be found elsewhere.
The falls of this country are due to the Articles of Confederation and a weak centralized government. To correct this, a strong national government will need to take its place. The majority of this delegation wishes to accept the Constitution as the new federal government of the United States.
Although no agreement was made, this simulation taught me a lot about dealing with group negotiations. The hardest part of this whole thing was that I had to deal with multiple parties, each with their own strong opinions. Overall, I am very pleased at how I handled myself and don?t think I would do much differently in the future. However, as is always important in business, I need to make sure my emotions do not interfere with the task at hand. I cannot take no?s as a personal rejection, but rather try to understand why they said no, and how I can persuade them to choose otherwise. Another thing that I will practice in the future is not to give up my strategy if an argument arises. I always try to do a mix of the Push and Pull styles and cannot let others move me from this middle. When the FED rejected the proposal I was suddenly turned into a Push Style negotiator and thinking back, that was not the right move.
The flag is draped over the casket of a soldier who dedicated their life to the ones who will never truly understand what the definition of freedom is. These people wake up every morning put their uniform on fully understanding the risk they are taking and willing to sacrifice their life for a nation who was based on the ideal concept of freedom. Stars and stripes fly in the wind as the American colonies defeat the British Empire who has oppressed a culture who wanted to establish a culture of liberty. The forefathers would create a document that would set a standard for the United States creating a list of freedoms that would be granted to every citizen of this great nation, this article is the Constitution of the United States. This document
A constitution is often defined as the main body of rules either written or unwritten, which describes the government and its method of operation. Besides a constitution just being a set of rules which governs an organisation, it goes into much deeper depth. According to Thomas Paine, he reveals that a constitution is something that is pre-existing to a government, giving legitimacy and defining powers under which a government may act. Due to Britain’s unwritten constitution, there was a sense of ambiguity in the word and whether if there was a constitution at all. Ironically, United Kingdom was once described as ‘the mother country or modern constitutionalism’. This goes to show that constitutionalism here does not require the existence