Constitutional Convention Of 1787

579 Words2 Pages

By 1787, the weaknesses of the new U.S. government under the Articles of Confederation had become sadly evident. Nationalist politicians such as James Madison of Virginia and Alexander Hamilton of New York revised the old governmental system and form a stronger union among the states. On February 15, 1787, the Continental Congress agreed and asked the states to select delegates to such a convention scheduled for May 14 that same year in Philadelphia. The states gradually responded, but it was not until May 25 that a quorum of state delegations had arrived and the Constitutional Convention, the Grand Convention of 1787, got underway. In the next four months, fifty-five delegates from twelve states (Rhode Island refused to send anyone) attended the …show more content…

In Employment Division v. Smith (1990), likewise, the majority of the justices announced that they would no longer use the standard of strict scrutiny when examining legislation of general applicability that placed an incidental burden on religion practices. When evaluating racial preferences in affirmative action programs, however, the Rehnquist Court applied the demanding standard of strict scrutiny. In the system of American government, the debate always plays an important part.The Constitutional Convention itself rarely comes into play in cases where the Supreme Court must interpret constitutional clauses. The most reliable account of the debates, James Madison’s Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787, did not even appear publicly until 1840. Furthermore, the Court preferred to interpret the Constitution by defining its terms in the context of a case before it. The Court, however, made good use of the debates in several important cases. Also, the debate is even important during the Presidential election. Candidate need to show their ideas to get the support of

Open Document