Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of conscience
How the conscience works
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of conscience
Introduction.
`Deep within his conscience man discovers a law which he has not laid upon himself but which he must obey. Its voice ever calling him to love and to do what is good and to avoid evil...'Gaudium et Spes (64). This opening quote from the Second Vatican Council is a good place to start in attempting to explore the complex subject of conscience. It indicates that conscience is something that can be known, based on love and is not just an individual personal thing. Conscience and having a soul are two of the distinguishing features of our humanity that set us apart from other species. Every religious code believes in a higher power and a morality that can be known or deduced by human reason. We are free rational agents capable of making decisions. How we act has consequences. In this essay, I will attempt to define what conscience is. I will then show how it evolves in a human, taking into account some psychological observations. The role of God in conscience is the most important one for Christians. How do we form our conscience in the light of God's teaching though his Son Jesus Christ? Finally, I will examine the Catholic Church's teaching on conscience.
What is conscience?
Conscience is defined in the dictionary as: "the ideas and feelings within a person, they tell one, when one is not doing right and warn one of what is wrong." We hear much about conscience: `the voice of conscience', `the rights of conscience', `informing conscience' and `following conscience'. Everyone is aware that they possess a conscience, but when asked to describe it, most people do not know how. They think of it as a feeling, mainly in terms of guilt, having done wrong, they express it in terms of: `my conscience is both...
... middle of paper ...
... justify our actions just to suit ourselves, for we will find justifying is easy and our conscience becoming dulled. We could dispense with our conscience, but to dispense with that is to dispense with Love.
For every man and woman has in his or her hearts a law inscribed by God. This conscience is our most secret core and sanctuary. There we are alone with God whose voice echoes in the depths.#
Bibliography
Catechism of the Catholic Church. Veritas. Dublin. 1994
Catholic Bishops Conference. Conscience. Veritas. Dublin. 1998.
Gulla, Richard M. Reason informed by Faith. Paulist Press. New York. 1989.
Hannon, Patrick. Knowing right from Wrong. Gill and Macmillan. Dublin. 1995.
McNamara, Vincent. The Truth in Love. Gill and Macmillan. Dublin. 1989.
Pope John Paul 11. Message for world day of peace. 1991
www.catholic.net Christian Conscience
I disagree with the quote, but I do agree that there are many references that are similar between J.F. Clarke’s quote and J. D. Salinger’s novel. Conscience is described as the awareness of a moral or ethical aspect to one's conduct together with the urge to prefer right over wrong. In the novel Catcher in the Rye, Holden is very brave by leaving his school and spending time by himself in one of the busiest cities in the world in New York City. I have mix feelings about whether or not Holden obeys his conscience. He is a typical bad boy, he smokes, tries to buy...
The call of conscience is continuous and it “summons” people to the challenge of assuming the ethical responsibility of affirming their freedom through resolute choice. For instance, people can structure and live their existence in a meaningful and moral way (Hyde, 2006, p. 39). Call of conscience is a driving force that pushes people to do what is morally right not only for them, but for others as well. Furthermore, call of conscience is a call of Being, “the call of Being demands courage from those who remain open to it and, in doing so, stand ready to acknowledge how their ways of thinking and acting may not be as authentic and respectful as they could possibly be” (Hyde, 2006, p. 51). A call of conscience persuades someone to do the right thing no matter what, even if a person helping someone else has the potential of having negative percussions for doing
Friedrich Nietzsche is recognized for being one of the most influential German philosophers of the modern era. He is known for his works on genealogy of morality, which is a way to study values and concepts. In Genealogy of Morals, Friedrich Nietzsche mentions that values and concepts have a history because of the many different meanings that come with it. Nietzsche focused on traditional ethical theories, especially those rooted in religion. Not being a religious man, he believed that human life has no moral purpose except for the significance that human beings give it. People from different backgrounds and circumstances in history bend morality's meaning, making it cater to the norms of their society. For example, the concept of what is "good" in the ancient Greek culture meant aristocratic, noble, powerful, wealthy, pure, but not in modern era. Meaning, in the past the term “good” was not applied to a kind of act that someone did but rather applied to the kind of person and background they had. Nietzsche’s project was to help expand one’s understanding by re-examining morality through genealogy of morality; helping one to be more aware of a potential confusion in moral thinking. He feels that the current values and concepts that have been instilled into a society are a reversal of the truth, forcing him to believe that one’s moral systems had to have been created within society. In the works of genealogy of morality, Nietzsche traces out the origins of the concepts of guilt and bad conscience, which will be the main focal point, and explaining its role in Nietzsche’s project against morality. It will be argued that guilt and bad conscience goes against Nietzsche’s role against morality because it can conflict with the moral co...
Without Conscience: Book Report Psychopaths all have something in common, and that's luring unexpected people in their traps. Its part of human nature to wonder and question the unknown. Psychopaths are a clear example of the unknown with their personalities and behaviors that are far from the norm on a continuum. We wonder what makes them do some of the unimaginable and horrific things to people and/or animals.
...nd analyzing the writing of Pope Francis it allowed me to further my understanding of not only his particular style of teaching, but also of the various issues surrounding Christian ethics. Reading his book, changed my perspective on a few issues and had an impact on me in regards to my life as a Christian. By writing this paper, I was able to identify the main focuses of Christianity in order to become more effect, relevant, and credible. In addition, I was able to further my understanding of the issues surrounding Christian ethics, which will allow me to help others more effectively by following in Jesus’s footsteps. Overall, I enjoyed the assignment and it opened up my eyes to the different issues surrounding the four areas of concern mentioned in The Joy of the Gospel, which are the new idolatry of money, option for the poor, inequality, and common good/peace.
The novel Of Mice and Men is also a perfect example of how obeying your conscience is hard. In the end of the novel, George has to face the fact that he has to take care of the problem that Lennie causes when he kills Curley's wife. George's conscience tells him exactly what to do and George knows what he has to do. In this example it is a little different. In other situations people would be afraid of what might happen after, however, in this situation George knows that he will be losing his best friend and in this situation it takes a tremendous amount of bravery to follow your conscience.
...requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts now accusing, now even defending them. “ (Romans 2:14-16)
as to how they should behave and thus, in a sense, 'tells us about the
“I have tried to make clear that it is wrong to use immoral means to attain moral ends. But now I must affirm that it is just as wrong or perhaps even more so, to use moral means to preserve immoral ends.”
A foundational belief in Christianity is the idea that God is perfectly good. God is unable to do anything evil and all his actions are motives are completely pure. This principle, however, leads to many questions concerning the apparent suffering and wrong-doing that is prevalent in the world that this perfect being created. Where did evil come from? Also, how can evil exist when the only eternal entity is the perfect, sinless, ultimately good God? This question with the principle of God's sovereignty leads to even more difficult problems, including human responsibility and free will. These problems are not limited to our setting, as church fathers and Christian philosophers are the ones who proposed some of the solutions people believe today. As Christianity begins to spread and establish itself across Europe in the centuries after Jesus' resurrection, Augustine and Boethius provide answers, although wordy and complex, to this problem of evil and exactly how humans are responsible in the midst of God's sovereignty and Providence.
In Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant argues that human beings inherently have capability to make purely rational decisions that are not based on inclinations and such rational decisions prevent people from interfering with freedom of another. Kant’s view of inherent ability to reason brings different perspective to ways which human beings can pursue morality thus it requires a close analytical examination.
Philosophical musings on the nature of morality are often expressed by thinkers who focus on human nature. Among the factors which determine human behaviour, a moral analysis of the concepts of right and wrong is often prominent. In investigating human behaviour through the relationship between reflection and action, this morality is often observed. Therefore, in the course currently entitled Human Sciences 101: Reflection and Action, both phiolosophy and morality are key themes. However, the calendar description for the course is as follows, “What is the relationship between thinking and action? Do they pull us in different directions? Can they be integrated? This course investigates how our own dialogue with core texts, from antiquity (e.g., Homer, Plato, Christian Scriptures) to the present (e.g., Joyce, Arendt), offers ways of understanding the dilemmas and issues raised by these texts and present in our culture” (Waterloo 2013). The description lacks a mention of the philosophical concepts of morality within the course's content. One of the core texts of the course where morality can be seen is Saint Augustine's Confessions, where Augustine explores a theological philosophy. The theme of morality is also seen in René Descartes' Discourse on Method and Related Writings, where Descartes proposes a scientific moral philosophy. Hannah Arendt's Eichmann in Jerusalem also explores morality through a philosophical examination of the relationship between thinking and committing evil. Therefore, the writings of Augustine, Descartes and Arendt each exhibit a philosophical perspective on morality which can be tied to the course's central theme of reflection and action. [END OF INTRODUCTION]
The second essay, "'Guilt,' 'Bad Conscience,' and the like" deals with guilt, bad conscience. Bad conscience came about with the transition from hunter-gatherer societies to permanent settlements. In settling down from the old nomadic ways of life a form of judicial system or laws rose up to enslave the animalistic natural tendencies of early man. Prehistoric people were more free spirited, less mediocre, they lacked depth. They allowed themselves to be governed by their instincts, and their will to power was turned outward toward conquest and survival. They had no interest in themselves and made no effort to control or understand their being.
Morality and the Bible & nbsp; Both the legal and salvation philosophies of the Old and New Testaments reflect those of the cultures around them, due to much copying and borrowing of laws and ideas. Furthermore, all societies around the world have similar moral and legal codes -- which is certainly not an accident. & nbsp; Interestingly enough, the moral codes of the world's religions bear a striking resemblance to each other, with only minor variations. Religions as different as Hinduism, Islam, and Buddhism all have proscriptions against killing, lying, cheating, stealing, etc. This is not an accident, for reasons we shall explore below. & nbsp; Christians may then object that there is something unique about the Bible that makes it a superior moral code.
Focusing only on the hard cases makes moral theology to become an abstract phenomenon detached from the social experience of individuals living under different social context. From the author’s perspective, morality should be “an everyday practice… the practice of appraising ourselves and others against notions of the good, or the right, or the fitting” (p. 7). For moral theology to shape everyday ethics, it needs to engage with the human element—understand what it means to be human, it can only do so in the realm of social anthropology. Moral theology failure to engage in the mundane is what turned it into a confession of sins profession. With confession, Christian ethics essentially became more about punishment, depending on the severity of the sin committed, than on