Conflicts In 'Enemies And Friends, By Tim O' Brien

594 Words2 Pages

In war, relationships are different than in civilian life as they focus more on just trust and not necessarily liking the other person. Tim O’Brien illustrates this concept in “Enemies” and “Friends” from his book The Things They Carried. These chapters follow Dave Jensen and Lee Strunk as they go from enemies to friends of sorts during the war in Vietnam.
In war tensions run much higher and cause combatants to snap at smaller things. This is exactly what begins the conflict between Jensen and Strunk as they began to brawl over a missing knife. Even though both of these men are on the same side, the smallest of fracture in their mutual trust as a company causes them to become enemies. In a civilian friendship this would be a simple disagreement which could easily be settled or abandoned after a small fight, but “this was Vietnam, where guys carried guns, and Dave Jensen started to worry.” The same factors that made this fight take place causes Jensen to …show more content…

This system allows the men to resolve conflicts among themselves and find “justice” where they see fit. This concept transcends both of the stories. In “Enemies” the square and even concept is what justifies Jensen in beating up Strunk, Strunk not retaliating, and Jensen breaking his own nose. This seems odd but to these men, in their eyes, it is fair. Jensen felt as if he had gone beyond his bounds in beating up Strunk, he saw that the punishment was worse than the crime, and it was because of this he expected Strunk to retaliate to settle the score. Strunk on the other hand thought that the beating evened them out and therefore he had no reason to retaliate, this is shown at the very end when he thinks that “ “The man’s crazy,” he said, “I stole his fucking jackknife.” ” This is what leads them to trust each other enough to make a death pact. Both men know that the other will do square by him and that gives them security and

Open Document