It is widely known, that for a country to be considered a state, it should have the three major components. First, the territory which is the first main component because no State can be found without one. The territory is the entire space delimited by frontiers over which the State must exercise its prerogatives. Second, the population which is the second element of the State. It is the human component without which the State cannot exist. Last but not least, the political authority which is the third element of the state and which the State cannot exist without because the State must exercise an exclusive authority called the sovereignty. The territory and the population must be subjected to the same political authority. …show more content…
Moreover, there are three forms of states: the Unitary State, the Federal State, and the Confideration State. In this essay, I will be discussing the Federation and the Confederation States. According to Rainer Benz:” A federal government is a system of dividing up power between a central national government and local state governments that are connected to each other by the national government.” Usually, the central national government deals with issues that may affect the country as a whole while the local state government deals with issues of local concern. Both the central national government and the local national government are allowed to make laws. There are many Federal States around the world such as the USA, Germany, Canada, Switzerland … Federal states can have advantages on one hand and disadvantages on the other hand. Starting with the advantages, since most Federal States have a large territory, such as the USA, sometimes, the central local government cannot always keep up with the demands and changes every area of the country needs. Therefore, the local state governments, which are “in the middle of the local society” according to …show more content…
The word “Confederation” is similar to the word “Federation” but it has a totally different meaning. A Federation, as stated before, has a strong central government whereas a Confederation is a contract or agreement that occurs between unconnected bodies to collaborate with each other. Confederations of States are usually created to deal with serious and hazardous situations like protection and security, external relations as well as the currency. There are many examples of Confederations such as Canada, the European Union, Iroquois League, and Serbia and Montenegro. Just as Federal States have their advantages and disadvantages, Confederal States do too. Starting with the disadvantages, first, in a Confederation, the center does not possess any power concerning taxation. In other words, it is not the function of the government to collect or appropriate taxes to regulate the national revenue . Second, the livelihood and maintenance of a Confederation is not always guaranteed seeing that this type authority or government is not durable although the Confederation is considered to be the most decentralized form. Furthermore, a Confederation is also described as an alteration period meaning that countries are changing from Confederation to
By joining Confederation, we can get that responsible government AND also be able to send six members to Parliament. Finally, with a responsible government, our suggestions, needs, and requests will be heard. The six members that resemble British Columbia will be sent to the Parliment to regard the community's concerns for Canada and our province, giving us a better chance at what we need, including roads, hospitals, and schools. Take Confederation as an opportunity to change British Columbia.
In order to secure the protection of the people’s rights of freedom from the imprisonment of tyranny, a compound government was formed. Central and State government came together to form the compound government, which in other words means federalism. It is one of the many elements that make up the protection of freedom from tyranny, “Hence a double security arises to the rights of the people.” (Madison FP # 51) The states combined covered our need of protection, protection of the countries by the Central government and protection of the people by the States government. Also by joining themselves together, “The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (Madison FP # 51)
In an effort to limit the power of the national government, Congress created one without enough power to govern effectively, which led to serious national and international problems. One of the main weaknesses under the Articles of Confederation was its incapability to regulate trade and levy taxes. The states controlled all of their “cash flows.” Sometimes, the states were in debt because of tariff wars that they would engage in with one another.
One of the key differences between the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation is in the way that they set up the Legislature. In the Articles, it is established as a unicameral legislature which it refers to as a Congress. The Constitution on the other hand establishes a bicameral legislature with an upper house, the Senate, and a lower house, the House of Representatives. The reason for this change was because different states wanted the number of representatives to be selected in different ways. Under the Articles of Confederation all States were represented equally and the bigger states felt that they should be getting more say in the decisions that the Country would be making. Needless to say the smaller states did not readily agree to this.
The Articles of Confederation was the United States first attempt at creating a democratic government. Instead of giving power to the central government they divided it up among the states (Kelly). This fact left the Articles with many weaknesses that ultimately led it to fail. The lack of a strong central government led to economic disorganization, no central leadership and an ineffective legislative, all which led to its downfall (Brackemyre). Leaving power to the states left the nation in a state of economic disorganization. Without the national government having the power to levy taxes, it was left with the states (Murphy). The legislature only had the right to request taxes, and it was left up to the states how they wanted to raise them, but they oftentimes weren't (Brackemyre). There was also no uniform system of currency which made trade between states difficult. The fact that states instead of Congress regulated trade led to a lack...
Confederation was a huge change for Canada in 1867. It made a huge influence on the world we live in. Our country faced many ups and downs along the way, while trying to create the best life for its citizens. For this, the country would have come together and accept each other. Today I’ll be telling you about how I believe Confederation was not successful at unifying Canada.
Thomas Jefferson believed that states could best govern the domestic matters within its state, but a strong Central Government is needed as well to deal with foreign affairs and to keep the country strong as a unified nation. "While smaller governments [states] are better adapted to the ordinary objects of society, larger confederations more effectively secure independence and the preservation of republican government."-Thomas Jefferson to the Rhode Island Assembly, 1801. What Thomas Jefferson was saying in this quote is that small governments like our state and our towns are the ones best fit to deal with the concerns of the people. In turn helping the people live the best and happiest lives possible. Which is the reason we have government.
The Articles of Confederation were incapable of providing the United States with an effective form of government. The Articles of Confederation presided weakly over the government as it allowed little or no power to tax, control trade, and branches of government were missing. In addition to this, the thirteen states acted as separate nations and the national government had little control over them.
To say that the Articles of Confederation provided the United States of America with an effective government would be quite an over exaggeration. For most people in modern day, an effective government would be one that can govern mass numbers of people and still be politically correct in overruling decisions on matters while keeping the law in mind, yet keeping the benefit of common good front and center. But, the Articles of Confederation were not written in the present day, so these ideals of a competent government were not quite applicable. For most people, an effective government was one that could govern mass numbers of people, still giving the states and the people many rights, while still being able to keep all under control. This would have eliminated any possibility that a federal government could become too strong or resemble a monarchy.
Theoretically, in a Federal system the sovereignty is shared between the national government and the local government but the ultimate sovereignty lies on the people. The federal government does not have the power to be involved in the states laws as they are only able to deal with national security, taxation and foreign affairs. The States however, deal with public welfare, education and justice. For instance, in different States there are different laws in executing criminals implemented as such in California death sentence is applied. However, it differs in practice whereby in the recent events the federal government is heavily involved in the public welfare especially when it dealt with major crises.
Federalism, by definition, is the division of government authority between at least two levels of government. In the United States, authority is divided between the state and national government. “Advocates of a strong federal system believe that the state and local governments do not have the sophistication to deal with the major problems facing the country” (Encarta.com).
Federalism is a legal concept that is centered around the concept that law is best handled as a two layered responsibility. Federalism is also built on a belief that sharing power with the local government is key to a successful governance. According to the text book, “the United States was the first nation to adopt federalism as its governing framework” (pg83). The following are a few examples of some advantages, as well as disadvantages of Federalism.
Globalization has effect the role of the state immensely; as the process of present’s challenges to state sovereignty and autonomy. In spite of borders becoming more ill-defined and fluid in as a result of the process of globalization (Weiss 2000, 2-3). The state will remain relevant and necessary because citizens need a place to cast their votes, taxes have to be paid to particular authorities, which can be held accountable for pub...
To examine what state formation is and how it has occurred the logical route seems to assess from where they have evolved. The notion of the state is a relatively recent concept, for example in 1555 there existed only two national states, England and France. With otherwise the existence of disorganised and corrupt empires, federations and protectorates. It appears states have formed despite the many obstacles facing their development. Not only did the challenges of securing territory exist but ri...
Max Weber defined a state as a body that successfully claims a monopoly of legitimate force in a particular territory . The government of a state carries out legislative, executive, and judicial functions in order to create internal control and stability in a country. The state is the universal form of political organization, which is composed of a population, territory, and sovereignty. All land (excluding Antarctica) is currently divided into 190 separate states. Examples of states include the United States, France, Chile, and many more. All states have a government that makes political decisions and aims to protect the state from external and internal attack. ...