Some historians recall the confederation interval of american history, from 1781 to 1789, probably the most valuable generation in the nation's progress. Having rebelled towards royal authority, the collection of yank colonies, now turn out to be a group of yankee states, needed to strengthen a new govt. This executive was the Articles of Confederation, a general structure, which was once ratified through all the states in 1781 before the revolutionary battle ended. However from their conception in 1781 to their abandonment in 1789, the Articles have been wholly inadequate, offering the U.S. With an ineffective govt. Probably the greatest contribution the Articles made was to exhibit the people that a robust primary executive was wanted. In …show more content…
Rawlin Lowndes reflected the attitudes of the pre-Constitutional era in his speech to the South Carolina residence of Representatives, when he mentioned that, rather than tear down the existing govt and adopt a constitution, attempts must be made to give a boost to the present constitution. Additional conflicts over the nature of the constitution came about between federalists, who supported a structure with provisions for a robust central executive, and anti-federalists, who liked supremacy of states' rights. These conflicts added to the present troubles of the federal government under the Articles of Confederation, for that reason making it much more tricky to rule …show more content…
The framers of the constitution had at the start imagined a weak presidency and a strong legislature divided into a condo of Representatives and the Senate. Below the Articles of Confederation, considerable minor bureaucracy had bogged down major business sufficient that legislators decided to establish an govt department to care for pursuits forms. When writing the constitution, the framers expected the Senate to manage main disorders, in particular the ratification of treaties, whilst the executive would attend to concerns of lesser final result. However, as deliberations persisted, the chief department received extra power to care for probably the most issues that had been a source of sectional anxiety under the Articles of Confederation—and so the President acquired the authority to behavior foreign family members. The two-thirds clause for ratification of treaties in the Senate, as opposed to a easy majority, allowed the South a larger voice in these issues and assuaged issues concerning the makes an attempt to abandon navigation of the
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the articles of confederation, which were ratified in 1781 before the revolutionary battle ended, were inadequate, offering the u.s.
- Explains that the articles of confederation were easy, and the congress was a weak physique, reflecting the united states' worry of monarchs. amendments could be made best by unanimous consent of all thirteen states.
- Analyzes how political get together struggles tended to bring about disunity within the early government, thereby weakening its effectiveness. rawlin lowndes reflected the attitudes of the pre-constitutional era in his speech.
- Explains that the articles of confederation, which were ratified in 1781 before the revolutionary battle ended, were inadequate, offering the u.s.
- Explains that the articles of confederation were easy, and the congress was a weak physique, reflecting the united states' worry of monarchs. amendments could be made best by unanimous consent of all thirteen states.
- Analyzes how political get together struggles tended to bring about disunity within the early government, thereby weakening its effectiveness. rawlin lowndes reflected the attitudes of the pre-constitutional era in his speech.
- Explains that the constitutional conference in philadelphia dealt with the problems of the susceptible primary govt that existed below the articles of confederation.
- Explains that the federal executive faced many challenges in conducting overseas policy under the articles of confederation, such as the 1783 treaty of paris, which ended the american battle of independence.
- Analyzes how the constitutional conference created a mannequin of government that relied on exams and balances by dividing federal authority between the legislative, the judicial, and the executive branches.
Harness the Power of AI to Boost Your Grades!
Haven't found what you were looking for? Talk to me, I can help!
Related
- argumentative
- explanatory
- analytical
- The Articles of Confederation verses the Constitutionargumentative essayThe Articles of Confederation on November 15, 1777 were accepted by Congress, but not ratified by all the states until March 1, 1781, Maryland was the last state to ratify. The Articles were a humble attempt to form a national government by a new country trying to unite itself. The Articles of Confederation, however, wanted the states to have the majority of the power. The Articles government was very weak, but this was done on purpose, because after finally gaining independence from Britain, they feared that a strong central government would lead to an empowerment of another monarchy. Alexander Hamilton called for a convention to be held in Massachusetts to advise congress to “render the constitution”. Several problems came about that led to a new Constitution to be written in 1787. The Constitution called for a more united government that was given more power. The Constitution was supported by two major politicians and they were George Washington and Benjamin Franklin, who called themselves Federalist. In this essay we will review the major conflicts and distinctions between the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution.
In this essay, the author
- Compares the articles of confederation and the u.s. constitution.
- Explains the conflict between the articles of confederation and the constitution. the connecticut compromise resolved the issue of equal representation by having the senate be equally represented regardless of population.
- Explains the conflict between the constitution and the articles of confederation: the government was not given the power to levy taxes, but the house of representatives was allowed to tax and raise revenue.
- Compares the articles of confederation and the u.s. constitution.
- Explains the conflict between the articles of confederation and the constitution. the connecticut compromise resolved the issue of equal representation by having the senate be equally represented regardless of population.
- Explains the conflict between the constitution and the articles of confederation: the government was not given the power to levy taxes, but the house of representatives was allowed to tax and raise revenue.
- Explains the distinction between the articles and the constitution. the first congress passed the bill of rights in 1789 and 10 states ratified them by the end of 1791.
- Analyzes the two major conflicts between the articles of confederation and the constitution.
1117 wordsRead More - The Constitutionexplanatory essayOf the 55 delegates sent to the Constitutional Convention, only 39 signed the completed document. Some did not even stay through the entire event because they felt it was headed in a direction that they could not support. These men had different reasons for their objections, some of which are discussed in this paper, but most importantly, they felt that the Constitution would threaten Liberty rather than secure it. The ratification of the Constitution was an essential first step to secure and stabilize this new national, but the voices and views of the Anti-Federalist were also very important. The first amendments to the Constitution, including the Bill of Rights, were due in much part to satisfy those voices and established many of the rights that we still hold dear today.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the constitution of the united states was created on september 17, 1787, but not everyone agreed that it should become the law of land.
- Explains that anti-federalists believed that a strong federal government would weaken or destroy the current state governments.
- Opines that the lack of a bill of rights was significant for americans that did not support the constitution.
- Explains that the constitution of the united states was created on september 17, 1787, but not everyone agreed that it should become the law of land.
- Explains that anti-federalists believed that a strong federal government would weaken or destroy the current state governments.
- Opines that the lack of a bill of rights was significant for americans that did not support the constitution.
- Explains that some founding fathers and anti-federalists believed that the constitution was not designed to protect the interests of common people.
- Explains that of the 55 delegates sent to the constitutional convention, only 39 signed the completed document.
670 wordsRead More - Many individuals are familiar with the Constitution or, at the very least, the concept of the Constitution. However, many are not knowledgeable of how the United States was governed prior to the Constitution. They are not knowledgeable of the documents that dictated the laws of its governing nor the factors that influenced such decisions. Many likely do not even consider the idea that the United States was governed under a different system prior to the establishment of the Constitution. However, for six years (1781-1787), the United States was governed by a radically different document known as the Articles of Confederations.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that many americans are familiar with the constitution, but aren't knowledgeable of how the united states was governed prior to it.
- Explains that the articles of confederation established a weak national government and strong state governments, unlike the constitution.
- Explains that the excessive taxes, trade regulations, and general coercions implemented against the colonies while ruled by great britain had a direct influence on the decisions made in the articles of confederation.
- Explains that many americans are familiar with the constitution, but aren't knowledgeable of how the united states was governed prior to it.
- Explains that the articles of confederation established a weak national government and strong state governments, unlike the constitution.
- Explains that the excessive taxes, trade regulations, and general coercions implemented against the colonies while ruled by great britain had a direct influence on the decisions made in the articles of confederation.
- Explains that without a national army/navy or leader, the united states was unable to address problems posed by the british occupation of the northwest territory and their encouragement of native american attacks.
- Describes the shay's rebellion, a series of rebellions led by farmers against tax collectors, which led to the massachusetts legislature requesting aid from congress.
- Explains that james madison's madison plan or virginia plan was the basis for the constitution. it addressed problems presented by the articles of confederation and addressed the fears of a tyrannical government.
- Explains that the madison plan had two legislative houses, an executive branch, and a judicial branch of government, which allowed the power of the national government to be separated and not controlled by one individual.
- Explains that the articles of confederation did not address the differences in state population, but addressed each state as a whole equally. the connecticut, or great, compromise was proposed.
- Explains the three-fifths compromise, which mandated that the slave trade would end in twenty years to prevent individuals from purchasing massive amounts of slaves to increase their voting power.
- Explains that the constitution protects the united states from tyranny by keeping one individual from making corrupt/inept decisions without another individual/group interfering.
1286 wordsRead More - Essay On Ratification Of The Federal Constitutionanalytical essayA year earlier, during the months of May through September, 1787, delegates from twelve of the thirteen states (Rhode Island chose not to attend) met in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to discuss the current governing document, the Articles of Confederation. Enacted in March 1781, the Articles of Confederation was an agreement which allowed for the separate and independent thirteen states to establish the United States of America as a confederation - or an association - of the thirteen sovereign states. With the ratification of the Articles, the United States became, not a government, but rather a “firm league of friendship.” This amalgamation of sovereign states attempted, through the Articles, to ensure unity and strength in numbers during the American Revolutionary War, but with its lack of power and authority, it succeeded in creating a weak and ineffectual central government.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how william richardson davie worried that his federalist movement in north carolina would die a slow and agonizing death before him.
- Explains that the articles of confederation, enacted in march 1781, allowed for the separate and independent thirteen states to establish the united states of america.
- Explains that davie and the other delegates meeting in philadelphia deliberated over the articles' inadequacies and determined what, if anything could be done to modify the document. the result was a new and different governing document altogether.
- Analyzes how william richardson davie worried that his federalist movement in north carolina would die a slow and agonizing death before him.
- Explains that the articles of confederation, enacted in march 1781, allowed for the separate and independent thirteen states to establish the united states of america.
- Explains that davie and the other delegates meeting in philadelphia deliberated over the articles' inadequacies and determined what, if anything could be done to modify the document. the result was a new and different governing document altogether.
- Recounts how the north carolina general assembly called for a state ratifying convention in july 1788. the delegates knew that only new york, rhode island, and north
- Opines that davie and his compatriots could persuade the opposition to ratify. the alternative was complete sovereignty. north carolina could step up and stake a claim on the nation.
- Explains that the antifederalists were great in number and voice and spoke with the true "spirit of '76." their opposition to the constitution had five major themes.
- Explains that the federalists believed in the need for a national power and an understanding of how that power should be utilized. they were concerned with public debt and the inability of the state to repay it.
- Explains that william davie knew that with the unfortunate and unequal number of federalist and antifederalist present at the ratifying convention, he would have to take a prominent role in defending the actions taken in philadelphia.
790 wordsRead More - Ratification Of The Constitutionexplanatory essayThe Articles of Confederation was the first document that established our government’s framework and functions. It was first proposed in 1777, and required unanimous approval among the states. The Articles were not completely ratified until 1781. The United States was still in its infancy when this document was created and set into place. The Articles intention was to unify the states and to ultimately create state sovereignty. The Articles of Confederation allowed for a weaker centralized government with the majority of the authority and power resting within th...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the articles of confederation was the first document that established our government's framework and functions.
- Agrees with elizabeth cady stanton and wendell phillips that the constitution fails to uphold and protect the rights and civil liberties of all men and women.
- Opines that the constitution creates a government that embodies the people, ensures justice in all matters, and promises equality. however, they have fundamental concerns about the integrity of the document.
- Explains that the articles of confederation was the first document that established our government's framework and functions.
- Agrees with elizabeth cady stanton and wendell phillips that the constitution fails to uphold and protect the rights and civil liberties of all men and women.
- Opines that the constitution creates a government that embodies the people, ensures justice in all matters, and promises equality. however, they have fundamental concerns about the integrity of the document.
- Describes the four issues that are up for debate before they can make their decision, including whether or not the constitution will provide adequate and equal representation and defend our rights.
- Explains that the antifederalists oppose ratification of the constitution. they want strong unified states, and a weak centralized government.
976 wordsRead More - What Are The Flaws Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbqanalytical essayDuring the Revolutionary War, it seemed necessary to the pro-independence Americans that they break away from England and form their own country. This country, of course, could not be started with no structure; the Americans needed a governmental basis, something which to build on. This cornerstone was to be the Articles of Confederation, the predecessor to our current Constitution. The Articles of Confederation, proposed by John Dickinson mere days after America declared its independence from England in July of 1776, were in effect from 1781 to 1789. The Articles were debated for a year until being approved in late 1777, and ratified by all the states on March 1, 1781. However, the Articles only lasted for less than a decade before being replaced. They had proved to be ineffective, and the government was rather too weak to handle many issues that arose while under the Articles. The Articles of Confederation showed their weaknesses especially when it came to economy of the country and land disputes in the west.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the articles of confederation, proposed by john dickinson, were in effect from 1781 to 1789. they lasted for less than a decade before being replaced.
- Argues that the articles of confederation's economic provisions were not enough to create any sort of stability.
- Explains that the articles were successful in settling western land than in creating an economy. the northwest ordinance was passed in 1787, declaring lands north of the ohio river the northwest territory.
- Explains that the articles of confederation, proposed by john dickinson, were in effect from 1781 to 1789. they lasted for less than a decade before being replaced.
- Argues that the articles of confederation's economic provisions were not enough to create any sort of stability.
- Explains that the articles were successful in settling western land than in creating an economy. the northwest ordinance was passed in 1787, declaring lands north of the ohio river the northwest territory.
- Analyzes how the articles of confederation set up a government that was nearly powerless and couldn't enforce its laws. the constitution was created in response to flaws, and has stood the test of time as the ultimate law of our land.
873 wordsRead More - The Need for a Constitutionanalytical essay“Pride of independence deep and dangerous hold on the hearts of many of the state politicians” ( Bennett, 112) The leadership under the Articles at the state level was more democratic. However, was heading towards oligarchy, because these men who were in power often only concern themselfs with their own state, and competing with other states to benefit their state or goals. The politicians were using their power to . The confederation is doomed, “Confederations have proved to be workable only in small countries that do not play major roles in international affairs and can resist or avoid aggressive nations due to special circumstances. The United States harbored potential as a great power with vast resources, making a strong executive branch necessary.” ( Schweikart, 16-7-Patriot’s Reader) The event to show the weakness of the state leadership under the...
In this essay, the author
- Explains why the u.s. rejected the more democratic government for a lesser one because the country was either going towards monarchy or an oligarchy.
- Analyzes how the jay-gardoqui treaty showed the weakness of the state leadership under the articles.
- Analyzes how the articles of confederation failed at the state and local levels, and the american people were considering a monarchy, instead of their democracy.
- Explains why the u.s. rejected the more democratic government for a lesser one because the country was either going towards monarchy or an oligarchy.
- Analyzes how the jay-gardoqui treaty showed the weakness of the state leadership under the articles.
- Analyzes how the articles of confederation failed at the state and local levels, and the american people were considering a monarchy, instead of their democracy.
- Explains that the constitution was designed to avoid a monarchy or an oligarchy, and to answer the problem in the current system, which were the corruptible nature of man.
792 wordsRead More - Confederation Dbqanalytical essayIn order to have a strong nation, Americans required a capable government. However, the Articles of Confederation failed shortly after its creation and the need for a new system was met with differences of opinion. Although the government clearly needed to be strong enough to enforce its laws, the question of how strong this new system should be created some difficult standards. The Constitution restricted American liberty because it was written by elites, for elites and as such, it could not protect the average American; the dismission of a large population, the limitation of democracy, and the need of the Bill of Rights demonstrated the new strains on the American's freedoms.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the articles of confederation failed shortly after its creation and the need for a new system was met with differences of opinion. the constitution restricted american liberty because it was written by elites.
- Analyzes how the constitution started with a bold, clear mission of serving "we the people," but only 50-five educated, wealthy men were there to create it. women, native americans, and african-americans were excluded from being treated as people.
- Explains that the anti-federalists saw a potential for the government to become too strong and easily corrupted. the separation of powers and the electoral college moved the power from the people to the states.
- Explains that the articles of confederation failed shortly after its creation and the need for a new system was met with differences of opinion. the constitution restricted american liberty because it was written by elites.
- Analyzes how the constitution started with a bold, clear mission of serving "we the people," but only 50-five educated, wealthy men were there to create it. women, native americans, and african-americans were excluded from being treated as people.
- Explains that the anti-federalists saw a potential for the government to become too strong and easily corrupted. the separation of powers and the electoral college moved the power from the people to the states.
- Explains that even with the federalist papers, the anti-federalists were not moved to accept the constitution as it stood. the idea that the bill of rights could restrict liberties was not far off.
429 wordsRead More - Confederation Dbqexplanatory essayThe United States had the challenge of setting up a sound economy, maintaining national independence, and establishing a strong political system which gave a legitimate place for opposition. In 1790, it was quite obvious that the Union would not stay stable. About five percentage of adult males that were white had voted. adult white males had voted to give formal consent to the new Constitution and two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, continued to encourage the Articles of Confederation. Vermont intimidated to join Canada.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the united states had the challenge of setting up a sound economy, maintaining national independence, and establishing strong political systems. in 1790, the union would not stay stable.
- Explains that the u.s. constitution made a general framework of government. it would be up to the first president and first congress to fill in the details.
- Explains that to gain popular support for the new government, congress also approved a bill of rights. the first ten amendments promised the rights of free press, free speech, and religion.
- Explains that the united states had the challenge of setting up a sound economy, maintaining national independence, and establishing strong political systems. in 1790, the union would not stay stable.
- Explains that the u.s. constitution made a general framework of government. it would be up to the first president and first congress to fill in the details.
- Explains that to gain popular support for the new government, congress also approved a bill of rights. the first ten amendments promised the rights of free press, free speech, and religion.
- Explains how the judiciary act of 1789 set up a federal court system. james madison had more pressing situations. to get more revenue, it passed tariffs on imports and imposed duties on foreign vessels.
- Explains that the continental and confederation congresses had met in the state house from 1775 through 1783. delegates to congress operated under a new frame of government, with different political realities.
499 wordsRead More - An Individual's Right to Liveanalytical essayOn March 4, 1789, the United States Constitution went into effect and along with it, a new federal government. The previous one under the Articles of Confederation had proved ineffectual in providing security, economic stability, and guaranteed civil li...
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how rex rammell believes that the federal administration has overstepped its boundaries in the affordable healthcare act, an act branded to many as obamacare, in relation to an individual's right to choose health care.
- Explains that the united states constitution went into effect on march 4, 1789, and along with it, a new federal government. this new central bureaucracy promised to be the solution to the problems that plagued its citizens.
- Analyzes how the whiskey act of 1791, a tax on distilled spirits created to fix the collective state debt incurred by alexander hamilton and his federalist associates, proved to be the final disappointment these americans could handle.
- Analyzes how rex rammell believes that the federal administration has overstepped its boundaries in the affordable healthcare act, an act branded to many as obamacare, in relation to an individual's right to choose health care.
- Explains that the united states constitution went into effect on march 4, 1789, and along with it, a new federal government. this new central bureaucracy promised to be the solution to the problems that plagued its citizens.
- Analyzes how the whiskey act of 1791, a tax on distilled spirits created to fix the collective state debt incurred by alexander hamilton and his federalist associates, proved to be the final disappointment these americans could handle.
- Explains that the whiskey rebellion began in 1791, and by 1794, armed militias led the rebels, the largest being the mingo creek association.
- Describes how the federalists received their desire, the use of armed force against the rebels, and a violent clash over individual rights appeared inevitable.
- Explains that although the whiskey rebels lost their rebellion, they helped to build the foundation for future struggles concerning rights.
- Compares the domestic issues revolving around healthcare and individual rights that idaho, along with the entire united states, face today to the issues that helped to create the whiskey rebellion.
- Explains that rammell has run for three elected offices since 2008, but he has lost in all three elections. he has consistently campaigned on a platform that declared idaho sovereign and independent of the federal government.
- Analyzes how idahoan militias have yet to adopt the militant strategies of the mingo creek association, despite the bluster of aspiring politicians over the perceived trampling of their civil liberties.
- Explains that the struggles for control and influence in modern elections, state and federal, are the same struggles that federalists and democratic-republicans went through over two centuries ago.
- Describes the works of alexander addison papers.
- Analyzes hogeland, washington, hamilton, and the frontier rebels who challenged america’s newfound sovereignty.
- Analyzes how rex rammell supports idaho militia groups.
1422 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of Federalismanalytical essayOn May 25, 1787 the constitutional convention began at the Independence Hall in Philadelphia in order to amend the Articles of Confederation. It was apparent to the framers of the Constitution that the Articles of Confederation lacked central authority over foreign and domestic commerce, threw many conflicts over time after the Revolutionary War. This wouldn’t be a harmonious amendment either. Between the Federalists and the Anti – Federalist they spent the entire summer creating a new government unlike any before. Leaving no one happy proving their creation was fair. One of the biggest conflicts was the balancing of the powers between the National and State government in our federal system (Barbour, Wright 74).
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the constitutional convention began in philadelphia on may 25, 1787 to amend the articles of confederation. the federalists and the anti-federalism created a new government unlike any before.
- Explains that federalism is a political system in which authority is divided between different levels of government.
- Argues that federalism is a flexible policy that allows americans to get the most from their country in an unbiased way.
- Explains that the constitutional convention began in philadelphia on may 25, 1787 to amend the articles of confederation. the federalists and the anti-federalism created a new government unlike any before.
- Explains that federalism is a political system in which authority is divided between different levels of government.
- Argues that federalism is a flexible policy that allows americans to get the most from their country in an unbiased way.
- Explains that the 10th amendment states that state and local governments have the power to make laws over everything else the national government doesn't.
1901 wordsRead More - Confederation Dbqexplanatory essayAfter defeating the Redcoats at the Battle of Yorktown in 1781, the American peoples finally had freedom from the British powers they had been rebelling against for so long. This freedom was met with the immediate need to create a strong nation of unified states to legitimize America as its own country. America at this time consisted of 13 colonies, each with their own sovereignty and power over their individual territories. The American people were naturally so far pleased with this system as they felt most in-touch with their colonial governments. The entire reason Americans broke away from their British forefathers was due to an oppressive central government that left the people virtually powerless. So when time came to draft a document officially declaring the separate powers of the states
In this essay, the author
- Explains that after defeating the redcoats at the battle of yorktown in 1781, the american people finally had freedom from the british powers they had been rebelling against.
- Explains that the articles of confederation were created in 1777, and ratified by the states. the states had to come to unanimous agreement in order to amend them.
- Explains that the united states constitution was created after the framers met in 1787 to revise the articles. the constitution gave the government power of taxation, draft troops, and regulate state trade.
- Explains that after defeating the redcoats at the battle of yorktown in 1781, the american people finally had freedom from the british powers they had been rebelling against.
- Explains that the articles of confederation were created in 1777, and ratified by the states. the states had to come to unanimous agreement in order to amend them.
- Explains that the united states constitution was created after the framers met in 1787 to revise the articles. the constitution gave the government power of taxation, draft troops, and regulate state trade.
508 wordsRead More - States' Arguments Against A Central Governmentanalytical essayThis four-page undergraduate paper discusses the opposition that American leaders encountered after the Revolution, as a result of deciding to form a central government. The states feared that such a government would suppress them and would interfere with their internal affairs. Consequently, heated debates and uprisings characterize this period, which started with the framing of Articles in 1777 and ended with the final adoption of the United States constitution in 1787.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes the arguments raised against the central government in new york's 'brutus' newspaper, which argued that the constitution should not be adopted.
- Explains that the original thirteen states ratified the constitution, but it took four years to get approved by all states.
- Explains that the american revolution was the longest and most painful war americans ever encountered. the leaders of the nation decided to write a central constitution which would be followed by all states.
- Analyzes the arguments raised against the central government in new york's 'brutus' newspaper, which argued that the constitution should not be adopted.
- Explains that the original thirteen states ratified the constitution, but it took four years to get approved by all states.
- Explains that the american revolution was the longest and most painful war americans ever encountered. the leaders of the nation decided to write a central constitution which would be followed by all states.
- Explains that anti-federalists raised voice against the articles, which declared that separate state laws and the central government would have absolute powers to control every state.
1096 wordsRead More - Compare And Contrast The Anemic Articles Of Confederationexplanatory essayBut although the Confederation was praiseworthy as confederations went, the troubled times demanded not a loosely woven confederation but a tightly knit federation. This involved the yielding by the states of their sovereignty to a completely recast the federal government, which in turn would leave them free to control their local affairs. In spite of their defects, the anemic Articles of Confederation were a significant steppingstone toward the present day constitution. They clearly outlined the general powers that were to be exercised by the central government. The Articles kept alive the flickering idea of the union and to hold the states all together as one. Yet, the Articles of Confederation, were weak though they were, proved to be a landmark in the government. They were, for those days, a model of what a loose confederation ought to be. Thomas Jefferson enthusiastically hailed the new construction, as the best one that was existing or tat did ever
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the articles of confederation were a significant steppingstone toward the present day constitution.
- Explains that the articles of confederation were a significant steppingstone toward the present day constitution.
304 wordsRead More