Confederate Governments

592 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Explain the relationship between the federal state and local government

A group of states or smaller political units that have agreed to follow a power central government is a confederal system. A confederacy that is composed by the states is often weak or loosely organized. These states have a lot of freedom because the majority of power is given to local governments. The central government has very little power. Examples of a confederal government are Belgium, the former Soviet Union, and Switzerland’s canton system. Advantages of a confederal government are that they give local or regional government’s almost complete control of decision making and law making. Confederate governments are focused on the needs of the people in each state. The government tends to be more in touch with its citizenry. Tyranny is …show more content…

In a unitary system the central government holds the most power. The power is not shared between states, countries, or provinces. Some examples of unitary governments include the United Kingdom, Japan, China, and France. Unitary governments are absolute monarchies or tyrannies more often than not. Most states in the world have a unitary system of government. The unitary state still has local and regional governmental offices, but these are under the auspices of the central government. Advantages of a unitary government is that the set uniform policies that direct the entire nation. Decision making and law making can be made more aligned this way. A unitary government is usually a more efficient use of tax dollars. A unitary government is a simpler management of an economy. It is also a smaller government. A disadvantage of a unitary government is that they disregard local differences. There are differences among countries and their individual cultures that can’t be entirely accommodated by a unitary government. A unitary government loses track of local issues easily. A unitary government is an incredibly divisive form of government. Unitary governments usually get bloated and bogged down since it is trying to replace the federal and state

Show More
Related

  • History of Southern Union

    739 Words  | 2 Pages

    Southern Union’s history dates back to the 1920s as a holding company for several gas utilities in Texas. Over the next sixty years the company expanded its gas utility operations and diversified into natural gas processing, exploration and production, refining, gas appliance sales, and real estate. This diversification strategy failed and in the late 1980s SUG divested everything but its natural gas distribution operations. In 1990 Southern Union was acquired by mobile phone company Metro Mobile, Inc; however, the resulting entity took the name Southern Union. The mobile phone operations would eventually be sold to Bell Atlantic and SUG re-focused on its natural gas distribution activities acquiring over 1.5mm customers through acquisitions in Missouri and the Northeast. In 2002, the company changed course once again decided to divest most of its gas distribution business and use the proceeds to expand into interstate natural gas pipelines. SUG acquired Panhandle Energy for $1.8bn in 2002 and its 50% stake in Citrus Corp, which owns Florida Gas Transmission, in 2006. Diversification continued when SUG acquired the natural gas gathering and processing firm, Sid Richardson, for $1.6bn. See the appendix for a map of Southern Union’s current operations.

    Read More

  • How Does the Constitution Protect the People from Tyranny?

    723 Words  | 2 Pages

    In order to secure the protection of the people’s rights of freedom from the imprisonment of tyranny, a compound government was formed. Central and State government came together to form the compound government, which in other words means federalism. It is one of the many elements that make up the protection of freedom from tyranny, “Hence a double security arises to the rights of the people.” (Madison FP # 51) The states combined covered our need of protection, protection of the countries by the Central government and protection of the people by the States government. Also by joining themselves together, “The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (Madison FP # 51)

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Federalist Federal And Confederate Government

    1036 Words  | 3 Pages

    Confederation- a group of individual states that are in an alliance, but the independent states each have more power than the central government

    Read More

  • Secession in the South

    544 Words  | 2 Pages

    Some states are currently threatening to leave the country because of the belief that the government has too much power over the people and the laws our country has to follow. In our society, we live by laws set by the government, and if any of them are broken, there is a punishment. These laws are set to make sure that the people of America are following the way things are ran so the country will not collapse. Although these laws are set for the safety of the people, sometimes when the government has that kind of power to make people follow certain things they should not have to follow, many issues arise. In the late 1800’s, many issues emerged between the South and the Union on whether the Southern states had the right to secede from the United States. The Southern states did have the right to secede because of political, economical, and social reasons. These reasons include numerous examples of the Union treating the South unfairly and violating the terms of the U.S constitution.

    Read More

  • The Reconstruction of the Union After the Civil War

    2101 Words  | 5 Pages

    The reconstruction of the Union began under President Lincoln before the end of the war, and carried on by President Johnson after the assassination of President Lincoln. After Lincoln’s death, the leadership of the nation bestowed upon Andrew Johnson of Tennessee. According to A. Brinkley (pg. 375), Johnson revealed his plan for reconstruction or “Restoration”, as he preferred to call it, soon after he took office and implemented it during the summer of 1865 when Congress was in recess. Like Lincoln, he offered some form of amnesty to Southerners who would take a pledge of loyalty to the Union. In most other respect, however, his plan resembled the Wade-Davis Bill. The next phase of reconstruction, known as the Congressional Plan or "Radical" modernization had begun, which undid everything started by Presidents Lincoln and Johnson. These radicals, mostly republicans, motivated by three main factors revenge, concern for the freedmen, and political concerns. The Radicals in Congress pushed through a number of measures designed to assist the freedmen, but also demonstrate the supremacy of Congress over the president. These events included the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the 14th Amendment, the Tenure of Office Act, and the Army Appropriations Act. The Radical Republicans prepared an effort in Congress to impeach the president Johnson as a payback for resisting their platforms. The vote in the Senate was 35-19 for conviction, one vote short of the necessary two-thirds. This was in turn to a few Republicans that had crossed over and voted with the Democrats, thus refuting the ultimate retaliation to the Radicals. If the removal of President Johnson had gone thru, it might have permanently weakened the executive branch. Congr...

    Read More

  • The Civil War: Reconstruction

    1148 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Civil war could very easily be known as one of the greatest tragedies in United States history. After the Civil War, the people of The United States had so much anger and hatred towards each other and the government that 11 Southern states seceded from the Nation and parted into two pieces. The Nation split into either the Northern abolitionist or the Southern planation farmers. The Reconstruction era was meant to be exactly how the name announces it to be. It was a time for the United States to fix the broken pieces the war had caused allowing the country to mend together and unite once again. The point of Reconstruction was to establish unity between the states and to also create and protect the civil rights of the former slaves. Although Reconstruction failed in many aspects such as the upraise in white supremacy and racism, the reconstruction era was a time the United States took a lead in the direction of race equality.

    Read More

  • Constitution Guards Against Tyranny Research Paper

    522 Words  | 2 Pages

    Federalism is the first reason how the Constitution guards against tyranny. It accomplishes this by dividing the power between the central government and the state government. It also establishes a double security system, which means that it separates the different levels of

    Read More

  • Preventing Tyranny: The Power of the Constitution

    1370 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some examples of these are indicated in Document A. It describes that the central government can, “regulate trade, conduct foreign relations and declare war.” Meanwhile, the states can, “set up local governments, hold elections and establish schools.” As James Madison said, “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” What James Madison is trying to say is that the central and state governments have enough power that they don’t control everything. The central government has enough power to help some of the country’s major needs and the state government has enough power to help the state’s needs because the state’s needs may be more specific. From this, you may conclude, that dividing powers between the central and state governments prevents tyranny. The first guard against tyranny was Federalism, which means a system of government in which power is divided between a federal government and state government. The guard of federalism shows one way in the constitution when they set up the compound government to make sure that the federal government doesn’t get too much power. The second way is when some responsibilities are given to the state government so that they can share the power equally. Federalism protects against tyranny because it ensures that the federal government doesn’t have too much say in

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The United States And Confederate States

    826 Words  | 2 Pages

    Formed at the eve of the Civil War, the United States (USA) and the Confederate States (CSA) were created for multiple reasons. The main reason of the formation includes that of political issues and slavery issues. Other ideas include the military, economics, etc. The USA was led by President Abraham Lincoln and the CSA was led under President Jefferson Davis. The CSA included the states of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Tennessee, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas. The United States and Confederate States can be compared based on their advantages and viewpoints in the fields of how and why they were formed, the rights of the federal and state governments, views on slavery, economic issues, and the military strategies.

    Read More

  • The Confederate States of America

    2711 Words  | 6 Pages

    As far as the Constitution of the Confederate States goes, it was not all that different from that of the United States. One difference is that it enables the president to serve a six-year term, as opposed to a four-year term in the United States. Also, the Confederate Congress is prohibited from placing a protective tariff on imported items and goods. The last major difference is that the Constitution grants more reserved powers to state government. In the United States Constitution, state governments had less of these powers. This was the major cause of the War, because Southern states felt that each state should have more reserved powers. Just as the United States government, the Confederate government was divided into three major branches: legislative, judicial, and executive branches. The legislative branch was known as the Confederate Congress. The components of the Confederate Congress were a Senate and a House of Representatives. District courts were the primary components of the judicial branch. A supreme court was never established, because of continuing controversy over the matter.

    Read More

  • Anti-Federalist vs Federalist

    2017 Words  | 5 Pages

    According to the Federalists in the early stages of the American republic, a strong central government was necessary to provide uniform supervision to the states thus aiding in the preservation of the Union. This necessity for a more organized central government was a result of the ineffectiveness of the Article of Confederation’s government that was without a unifying government body. One component of this philosophy was the creation of an executive and other federal branche...

    Read More

  • Does The Eu Have A Federal Character

    921 Words  | 2 Pages

    A Federal system is a system of government where power and sovereignty are shared constitutionally between a central authority and subunits. The central authority retains primary sovereignty while the subunits (state, province etc.) retain a degree of autonomy. Examples of federal countries include Ethiopia, Germany, and USA etc.

    Read More

  • What Are The Advantages Of A Unicameral System

    911 Words  | 2 Pages

    First, unicameral systems have the ability to quickly enact a bill. This is because there is no need for an absolute compromise between two chambers of the legislature. It is highly efficient in getting legislation passed. Bicameral systems, however, do not have this ability. One drawback of bicameral systems is that the passing of legislation is a long and drawn-out process. In the United States, the House will propose a bill, vote on the language, and send it to the Senate. If the Senate does not agree with the language 100%, the bill is sent back to the House. At this point, the process starts all over again. Many potentially helpful bills will not be considered, especially if two different parties hold a majority in each branch of congress. In unicameralism, it takes one majority vote to pass legislation and put it into law. Furthermore, unicameral systems force elected officials to have greater accountability. In bicameral bodies, officials point to the upper (or lower) house(s) when something goes wrong. Striving to save their public image, legislators often are not as accountable for their actions in bicameral systems. Since each elected official is the inly

    Read More

  • Federalism

    1206 Words  | 3 Pages

    I believe that the advantages that Federalism provides far outweigh those of the anti-federalist movement. Our founding fathers wisely perceived that the idea of a centralized government was a big concern for abuse of power. Federalism represents many of the values of modern Democracy and grants individual states the power to make decisions that best suit their needs. Local government understands local issues better than a centralized government that often sees the nation as one big piece of land instead of smaller areas, each with distinct demographics and problems. For instance, issues concerning illegal immigration in Texas would be best handled by local authorities rather than by someone in Kansas, a non border state. By the same token, representatives of communities with different aspirations, ethnicity and cultures should be handled locally as the federal government might overlook the needs of these groups. One perfect example of the above mentioned scenario is the public school system. In a federalist system the local government decides what kind of schools will operate. Therefore, they might make better decisions when it comes to opening schools among large immigrant populations, perhaps creating a few bi-lingual schools to fulfill the population’s needs.

    Read More

  • Essay On Centralization And Decentralization

    748 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ease of Expansion: In a growing corporation, decentralization can facilitate the method of enlargement. To explicate if I open a brand new business inside the new geographic region, decentralization allows the brand new unit to manipulate as an independent entity, it works very easily consistent with wishes of the neighborhood area and sells products that appeal to the local

    Read More

More about Confederate Governments

Open Document