Comparing The Soldier by Rupert Brooke and Dulce Et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen

670 Words2 Pages

Comparing The Soldier by Rupert Brooke and Dulce Et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen

World War I, probably the most horrible of modern wars, inspired some

of the most beautiful and powerful poetry of the 20th century. Two

very good examples are "The Soldier" by Rupert Brooke and "Dulce Et

Decorum Est " by Wilfred Owen, both were written before and during the

this war.

Rupert Brooke was a well- educated English man who lived the

enthusiasm of the whole country when the war started. He wrote this

and many other poems with the illusion of a very short war with a

happy-ending. He joined the army and went to war. However, he didn't

have the chance to fight because during the journey to the front he

died from mosquito poison. The life of Wilfred Owen was very different

from Rupert Brooke's. Owen was a middle class English man who didn't

have the education of Brooke. He also joined the army yet he did

experience the horrible reality of war. Seven days before the

armistice was finally signed, he was killed in the field.

Even though they were written during the same period, both poems are

completely different. They contrast in content, language, structure,

tune, imaginary and message.

"The soldier" and "Dulce Et Decorum Est" are about soldiers dying for

their country. Nevertheless, they have very different content. Owen

poem describe us the cruel death of a soldier during a gas attack and

the feeling of guilty of his companion after seeing his sad ending. On

the other hand, Brooke tell us about who his death and the death of

many British soldiers will enrich the earth of " foreign fields" as he

describes them. Brooke's poem is full of pat...

... middle of paper ...

...he country is the proper thing to do and that if you

died during the war you will enrich other parts of the world. It is a

very patriotic poem and it help to understand what English people

thought of the war before it started. Owen thought quite the opposite,

he believe that the war was the worst thing you could live in and told

us that the war wasn't the proper thing to do because the only result

of it was the death of many young man. This poem describe us what

people thought of the war when they lived in it.

In Conclusion, both poems are different from each other. They have a

different view of war. I personally like more "Dulce et Decorum est"

because of his powerful imagine and language. The soldier was for me

very patriotic and superficial, but I could imagine that was the

feeling in the whole world in that time.

Open Document