Comparing Giotto´s Arena Chapel And Duccio's Maestà

819 Words2 Pages

As discussed by Kloss (2005), the subject matter of Giotto’s Arena Chapel (1303-05) and Duccio’s Maestà (1308–11) are similarly both narrative cycles of Christian biblical scenes depicting the lives of the Virgin Mary and Jesus Christ. Giotto’s cycle of paintings were done in frescoes which adorn the walls of the Arena Chapel in Padua Italy. Duccio’s Maestà was a double sided altarpiece for the Cathedral of Siena, Siena, Italy with tempera and gold on wood. The main frontal image is the Madonna and Child Enthroned and the reverse side consists of forty smaller images of biblical accounts from the life of Mary and Jesus. According to Kloss (2005), Giotto, born Giotto di Bondone (1266/7-1337) was from Florence Italy and Duccio, born Duccio …show more content…

The Scrovegni Chapel the Arena Chapel’s proper name was commissioned by Enrico Scrovegni. Enrico’s father, Riginaldo who died when Enrico was twelve, was a wealthy albeit corrupt man whose wealth and notoriety resulted from lending money at usurious rates. Since Riginaldo was so despised, as to be included in Dante’s fictional hell in his Divine Comedy (1307), Enrico commissioned the chapel in redemption for the family’s sins. Kloss speculates the illustration of the Annunciation was positioned to be the first image visible upon entering the chapel “and as the first significant act in the Christian drama of salvation, this is absolutely appropriate, for this chapel is a burial chapel for the Scrovegni family. Enrico Scrovegni undoubtedly hoped for salvation, and after years of exile in Venice, where he died, he was buried here” (L6). Giotto incorporated Enrico’s image in the illustration of the Last Judgment where he is depicted as kneeling “at the foot of the cross, and he's offering a model of his chapel, which is supported by a friar on the right to, the Virgin Mary accompanied by a saint and an angel. Of course, he's positioned at the right hand of the enthroned Christ, among the saved” …show more content…

Instead of the powerful naturalism of Giotto, Duccio accepted the lyrical and austere beauty of Byzantine art and he imbued it with a new spirit, the spirit of the humanism, or at least the heightened awareness of humanity, that was issuing from the newly founded Franciscan and Dominican orders. This is true of Giotto, but it is true of Duccio also (L8). Both Duccio and Giotto painted architecture within their paintings adding depth and a sense of space to two dimensional planes. They both also used bright colors and shadow creating more realistic textures and humanness to their figures. Giotto became known for facial expressions creating narrative drama. Both artists depicted deeply emotional subject matter which portrayed serene as well as violent images with beautiful artistry. As stated by Kloss

Open Document