Comparing Genghis Khan And The Rapier

292 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Medieval warfare technology

The things they parried were largely determined by the geographical region and time period. Among the things parried were scimitars, rapiers, talwars, claymores, katanas, the gladius, and the cutlass. Each of these swords are different in design and function. For example, the talwar is used by cavalry to cut and slash, while the rapier is used by Spanish officers for duels and self defense. Alexander the Great, because he led his men on horseback, would use the kopis sword because it proved useful in mounted combat. Napoleon Bonaparte used the rapier because it allowed him to thrust it into his enemies with deadly efficiency. Genghis Khan would take advantage of the curved design of the scimitar because of it’s effectiveness as a slashing

Show More
Related

  • Cival War Weapons

    439 Words  | 1 Pages

    Saber a sword was only the Calvary and generally in the beginning of the war were used regularly and to their full extent Saber became marks of ranking later years and were abandoned in favor of efficient weapons.

    Read More

  • Comparision of the Aztec and Mongol Empires

    586 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Aztec and Mongol empires were large, expansive realms that shared many similarities in their rise to power, but also had some differences. The Aztec and Mongol Empire's rise to power were similar politically in that they both conquered neighboring nations, similar socially in that their social structures both emphasized warriors, but were different economically in that the Aztecs relied on tributes from conquered lands to fund their expansion whereas the Mongols destroyed lands they conquered to prevent challenges to their power.

    Read More

  • Gettysburg

    642 Words  | 2 Pages

    When in combat, both sides had the same kind of artillery. Soldiers used muskets and small handguns and generals on the other hand would ride on horseback with a sword and pistol. Another type of weaponry that was used were cannons. Even though cannons were much more powerful, muskets were easier due to the fact that they were portable and fired rounds quicker.

    Read More

  • How Barbaric Were The Mongols Essay

    625 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many people ask “How Barbaric were the Barbarians”. The truth be told, the mongols were more barbaric than they were peaceful. They were able to conquer more than 4,800,000 miles of land using brutal and strategic military tactics, destroy and conquer cities, along with using extremely harsh punishments for their prisoners. Because of this, the mongols were able to stay in power for about 300 years. Many people believe that they mongols were more peaceful than they were barbaric because of how economically stable they were. However the mongols killed thousands and left millions terrified across Asia.

    Read More

  • Mongols Battle Tactics

    672 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mongols, Vikings, Apache, and Spartans. Some of the most and deadly armies in history, but who would win if they met on the field of battle. I think that the Mongols would win for a number of reasons. First, they had superior battle tactics, second, they had weapons that would overpower the other armies, third, they had excellent horsemanship, and fourth, they had a great leader by their side. The Mongols also left a big impact on world history.

    Read More

  • Genghis Khan and the making of the Modern World

    1542 Words  | 4 Pages

    When the word “Mongol” is said I automatically think negative thoughts about uncultured, barbaric people who are horribly cruel and violent. That is only because I have only heard the word used to describe such a person. I have never really registered any initial information I have been taught about the subject pass the point of needing and having to know it. I felt quite incompetent on the subject and once I was given an assignment on the book, Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern Age, I was very perplexed for two reasons. One I have to read an outside book for a class that already requires a substantial amount of time reading the text, and secondly I have to write a research paper in History. I got over it and read the book, which surprisingly enough interested me a great deal and allow me to see the Moguls for more than just a barbaric group of Neanderthals, but rather a group of purpose driven warriors with a common goal of unity and progression. Jack Weatherford’s work has given me insight on and swayed my opinion of the Mongols.

    Read More

  • Comparing The Culture of the Mongols versus the Pakistanis

    1890 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the following paper, I will be comparing the five institutions between the Mongols and the Pakistanis, discussing the unique qualities that distinguish these cultures from one another. These five institutions include topics such as religion, economics, education, politics, and family.

    Read More

  • Tacitus Germania Summary

    1128 Words  | 3 Pages

    In relation to war, the most preferred weapon was the javelin, which could be used for both close combat and long range. The javelin was a highly effective weapon and it ensured that those using it were not easy to defeat. Furthermore, the javelin was often used alongside a shield, which was essential for not only blocking attacks, but also kept the enemy at bay while the javelin was used to strike. 'The horse' was also used but because of having to use both a shield and

    Read More

  • Weaponry during the Elizabethan Period

    1044 Words  | 3 Pages

    Long distance weapons were essential to European combat. The main long distance weapons used by Europeans during that time were the longbow and the crossbow. Each form of weaponry had its unique advantages and their pejorative. The long bow (shown in figure 1) was the original form of distance weapons. The term ‘bow’ means to be made from wood, iron or steel. The Welsh, who inhabited England, were the first people to use longbows. Longbows were 6-7 feet long and had a range of 250 yards, and still had the ability to pierce a knight’s armor (Byam 12). A well trained archer could shot 10- 12 arrows in a single minute. Despite these pro’s the longbow had a lot of disadvantages as well. One draw back was only skilled archers, who were costly to train, could use a longbow. Another disadvantage was it didn’t have a ready loaded arrow (Edge 34). The crossbow (shown in figure 2) on the other had been emphatically different. The crossbow had a span of 2-3 feet and could kill a knight on horseback with one shot, because of good aim (Byam 30). Crossbows had ready loaded projectiles, while the longbow didn’t and the crossbow could be used by anyone since it didn’t require any skill. The crossbow did have a down side though, it had slow reloaded because of a crank and it was expensive. Crossbows were also used for other thi...

    Read More

  • Elizabethan Weapons Essay

    405 Words  | 1 Pages

    For instance, a few swords (the sword is a very important weapon during the Elizabethan era) were utilized as a part of a pushing movement, while some different swords were utilized as a part of a striking movement. In any case, swords were not by any means the only weapons of this time. There were bows and bolts, and also the weapons that knights utilized as a part of fight, and even some early guns discovered their roots in the Elizabethan era.

    Read More

  • Catapult Design

    570 Words  | 2 Pages

    The most commonly used weapons in ancient weapons as siege engines were battering rams, catapults, and assault ladders. Battering rams were most commonly used because of their protection that they allowed to hide behind and also because of their use in taking down a castle wall (Siege Engines). Assault ladders were ladders that were used to scale the walls of the castle so that they could enter into the castle. A huge disadvantage was the enemy could push the ladders away and the enemy would shoot arrows at them as they were trying to enter. The advantages of the catapult ended up overpowering the advantages of other siege weapons. Some of these advantages included being able to shoot a projectile from long distances, a large amount of damage, and relatively unskilled laborers to operate a machine. The bulk amount of people affiliated with catapults only helped to move and wind up the machine. There was a soldier in charge of positioning and how far back the catapult should be in relation to the castle. Most catapults launched large rocks, arrows, diseased cows, and explosives as the century went on. During Medieval ages castles starte...

    Read More

  • The Life and Achievements of Genghis Khan

    934 Words  | 2 Pages

    Genghis Khan’s birth was truly unique, the creation of a leader. Genghis Khan was born in the 1160s under the name Temujin, which translates to blacksmith. He was born about 200-mi. northeast of Ulaanbaatar near the Onon River, in Mongolia. Temujin’s birth resulted in stories saying that he grasped a clot of blood in his hand, this sign granted good fortune and was the token of a leader. He was the 3rd oldest son of his father and the oldest son of his mother. Temujin had 3 brothers and 1 sister, in addition to two half brothers. His family was nomads as many Mongol families were. His father, Yesukhei was a chieftain, therefore causing Temujin to be born into a noble lifestyle. However this privilege would allow him to gain power quickly and effectively.

    Read More

  • Kubla Khan Analysis

    1098 Words  | 3 Pages

    Samuel Coleridge's poem Kubla Khan is a supremely beautiful example of the Romantic belief regarding creative thought and the creative process. It is a whimsical peek at the nature of the unconsicious and at the art of inspiration and holding on to imagination that has captivated many for its musical and lyrical nature. Although deemed largely unfinished and incomplete by some scholars and by the author himself, Kubla Khan has held its ground as a literary masterpiece of its time for its impeccable structure, vivid imagery, unquestionable style, and most of all, the lasting impression of both confusion and awe it leaves on its audience.

    Read More

  • Iliad And Troy Essay

    692 Words  | 2 Pages

    the Sword was the main tool for war. On the other hand, Maximus in the film Gladiator engages in a duel with Commodus, stabbing him with the sword.

    Read More

  • Japanese Samurai and European Knights: Were the Similarities Greater Than the Differences?

    1083 Words  | 3 Pages

    I believe we can all agree that Japanese samurais and European knights are two of the most skilled and famous forms of warriors in history, right? Well both warriors began their trade at a very young age, and went through multiple stages of training throughout their lives. They both had a code of honor basically, but they differed from one another in quite a few ways. The big question is, “Were the similarities greater than the differences?”. Right off the bat I began to ponder the technicalities of the answer to this question. Before I get too scrambled up in the technicalities, let’s discuss some these differences and the similarities and figure out how this plays out. Before we conduct this discussion, let’s review our key terms. A clan is a group of close-knit and interrelated families. Feudalism was a political and economic system that flourished in Europe from the 9th to the 15th century, based on higher classes giving random services and items in exchange for something else. Knights were men who served their lord as a mounted soldier in armor. Samurai’s were members of a powerful military social class in feudal Japan. A shogun was a hereditary commander-in-chief in feudal Japan. Chivalry was the medieval knightly system with its religious, moral, and social code. Bushido was the code of honor and morals developed by the Japanese samurai.

    Read More

More about Comparing Genghis Khan And The Rapier

Open Document