Comparing Democracy By Langston Hughes And Reginald Rose

544 Words2 Pages

Chaya Ramdeen 708
MS 137-Strom The two authors Langston Hughes and Reginald Rose both have strong perspectives on democracy. Although, they both have strong opinions on democracy one author presented their opinion with a stronger message. For instance, Langston Hughes has a stronger view of democracy, because in his poem “Democracy” it gave a stronger message on what he is trying to convey. Langston Hughes gave a better interpretation of democracy than Reginald Rose. Therefore, there’s many reasons that show he has a stronger perspective. Langston Hughes says that democracy isn’t actually happening until everyone can have it. For example, in one of his quotes from the poem, “Democracy” he is trying to say that democracy can’t be fair or happen until everyone is free to have it, and it shouldn’t come through compromise and intimidation. On page 111 lines 1-4, it reads, “Democracy” will not come today; this year nor ever through compromise and fear this connects back to the thesis, cause he shows strong feelings how we all need the rights in order for democracy to happen. Therefore, Hughes shows (explains) his opinion that democracy is not going to happen …show more content…

What Hughes means by this is that he is trying to say that everyone no matters their skin color or anything, everyone deserves to have right and freedom. For example, on page 112 lines 1-4 it reads, “I have as much right as the other fellow has to stand on my feet and land”. This quote connects back to the thesis because it shows how strong Langston Hughes feels that he and others have as much right and freedom as suppose to the white people. As you can see, Langston Hughes feels that on democracy everybody should have it and

Open Document