Comparing Buck And Spitz In Jack London's Into The Wild

311 Words1 Page

One of the major theme London presents through his character’s Buck and Spitz is that competition has the potential to be negative. Buck and Spitz are both dedicated members of an Alaskan dog sled team. They are both competing for the most coveted position on their team, the leader. “Dave was the wheeler or sled dog, pulling in front of him was Buck, then came Soleks; the rest of the team was strung ahead, single file, to the leader, which position was filled by Spitz”(London 12). There is conflict amongst the dogs to obtain this position, and Buck and Spitz will do anything to make sure they get it. The leader gets the most respect from the others and has the greatest responsibility on the team, and it is similar to the role of a captain in sports like basketball or football. The competition to be the best on the team and have the best spot on the team causes rivalry. …show more content…

Spitz “went out of his way to bully Buck, striving constantly to start a fight which could end only in the death of one or the other” (15). Eventually, Buck kills Spitz as a result of one of their fights. Their tension grew so strong that Buck and Spitz begin fighting to the death. This extreme is a way for London to examine the effects competition can have. Although he uses their rivalry as a way to improve their skills, he ultimately chooses to show the negatives of this concept. Rivalry is the cause of Spitz’s death, and it began with competition. Hence, London holds a negative connotation for the competition between Buck and Spitz, and he utilizes these two characters to exemplify his

More about Comparing Buck And Spitz In Jack London's Into The Wild

Open Document