Comparing Alan Seeger And Emily Dickinson's Poems

685 Words2 Pages

Alan Seeger and Emily Dickinson further explain through their poems view point that death is not feared but anicipated. Dickinson elaborates in her text that death is not something to be feared but, calmly anticipated. In the poem it states,” For only Gossamer, my gown/ My tippet-only Tulle/ We paused before a House that seemed” (Dickinson 15-17). Dickinson gives hints to the fact she is already dead and is willing accept it. Dickinson uses the word Gossamer, which is a web or thread like substance, and once she dies that she gets very cold because she does not have the proper clothing to prepare for death. Her being cold represents her getting closer to death. The gown is very thin and is unable to support her through the cold weather she is going through. A tulle …show more content…

The days feels shorter to her because she is trying to cope with her death through her past experiences with death. Dickinson claims she first thought that the “Horses Heads had a different meaning. Dickinson used the term “Horses’ Heads” becauses the heads of horses literally only face forward and facing towards eternity. She then ends the poem “towards eternity to further explain that once you die you die for an infinite amount of time and there is not a resurrection. Seeger also further also explains how death is not something to be feared but, calmly anticipated. In the text it states, “ At midnight in some flaming town/When Spring trips north again this year/ And I to my pledged word am true/ I shall not fail that rendezvous” (Seeger 21-25). Seeger uses flaming towns to represent trench warfare. During World War 1, they would use flame throwers as a form of defense. Seeger also said, “When Spring trips” though Spring does not trip and always returns. Seeger also explains how he pledged which is using diction. He pledges to his country and also pledges to death knowing that he will die when he fights the

Open Document