Compare And Contrast The Virginia Plan

484 Words1 Page

The Virginia Plan, the New Jersey Plan and the Connecticut Compromise were all ideas created by people to organize the government, because the Articles of Confederations eventually failed. The Virginia Plan was created by James Madison. The New Jersey Plan was created by William Paterson. The final plan or compromise proposed was the Connecticut Compromise, and it was created by Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth. Each of the plans had different ideas on how the government should be ran. The Virginia Plan, created by James Madison, favored large states and Madison wanted a bicameral legislature. A bicameral legislature is where the legislature is divided into two separate parts. The bicameral legislature proposal would later become the footprints to the executive and judicial branches. Madison wanted the number of votes each state received in congress to be based on state population. He proposed this because it would protect the large states’ interest in the new government which would be stronger federally than under the Articles of Confederation. The Virginia Plan also gave power to the states to create laws if they wanted too. Small states such as New Hampshire did not necessarily like the proposal of Madison’s Virginia Plan. The small states wanted more power as they were felt that they were being left out. …show more content…

It obviously gave more power to the small states as it states that every state should only get one vote in congress. Every state getting one vote would be exactly what was said in the Articles of Confederation. Even though the small states wanted the New Jersey Plan, it was somewhat not well thought out as it did not include the Executive and Judicial Branches that the Virginia Plan did. Many people and states did not like the New Jersey plan because they felt like they needed a stronger government as the New Jersey Plan left out many

Open Document