Compare And Contrast The Crusades And The Crusades

823 Words2 Pages

The people of the middle ages showed their faith in many ways some were through prayer or fasting and others took a more violent approach. The Crusades were a way for men to resolve themselves of their sins according to Pope Urban II. This was also a way for the Crusaders to take back what they believed was stolen from their ancestors and their god. This was not only from the men who went to fight, there were also the elderly, women, and children who felt they needed to go help their faith. This would also make the Muslims who had control over Jerusalem because they believed it was their holy land as well. They on the other side had to protect their faith and pay their own piety. This would also cement the relationship of Christians and Muslims for …show more content…

But the definition of the word Piety is “to be reverence for god or devout fulfillment of religious obligations”. This give the word a very broad interpretation and the Crusaders took their interpretation to an extreme. Blood has been spilled for God for centuries before the crusades and for centuries after and is still today. But the Crusades are different because they were a form of Piety. The Crusades were sanctioned by the Pope to reclaim Jerusalem from the Muslims it was a form of pilgrimage. They believed they were doing their honor towards god and they planned to do this by any means necessary while wearing the sanctioned cross of the Church. The Muslims were also doing their duty to god as they were on the opposite end and they were protecting the holy land from men who were coming to take it from them. Most scholars agree that one of the main reasons for the crusades was Pope Urban ii and a quest for political power. His presence as the Pope help cement the Crusading and set it on his path maybe not the path he intended but it was his presence and words that did it. according to P AUL E. C

More about Compare And Contrast The Crusades And The Crusades

Open Document