Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The crusades a different point of view
Why did pope urban ii call for the crusade
02.03 the crusades
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The crusades a different point of view
The First Crusade was called in 1096 by Pope Urban II. The reasons for the First Crusade was to help obtain Jerusalem known as the holy land. During this time period the Muslims were occupying Jerusalem. First Crusade contained peasants and knights’ whose ethnicities consist of Franks, Latin’s, and Celts which were all from the western part of Europe. To get peasants and knights to join Pope Urban II objectives in return of a spiritual reward called “remission of all their sins” which was to be redeemed of any sins the individual has committed. When sins are redeemed Crusaders believed that they will escape the torment of hell. When lords and knights joined the crusade they were known as military elites. Crusaders were known as soldiers of Christ. The Crusaders purpose was to fight against non-Christians, and convert non-Christians into Christians. Examples of Non-Christians were Muslims and Jews. Although crusades were warriors, they had limit warfare meaning crusades couldn’t cause blood shed on holy days or weekends. A rise of Seljuk Turks who were a Muslim nomadic warrior group and asserted their political control. Seljuk Turks not only expanded their political control they also took half the Byzantine Empire with them. Byzantine Emperor named Alexius Comnena asked Pope Urban II for assistance to regain former territory the Byzantines had lost. During this time period Emperor Alexius had his daughter Anna Comnena documented his life and campaigns he did. She also spoke highly of her father, making Emperor Alexis an honorable and courageous man. Pope Urban II had his objectives on Jerusalem known as the holy land and to help liberate Christians in the east. In these several documents crusades were l... ... middle of paper ... ...r example, that he was a leader of the “whole expedition”)” also states “The letter is a good illustration of what a crusader was supposed to think about the enterprise, whether he did or not” 293. | The first two documents were more accurate than the third because the first two documents consists of what the crusades did to the non-Christians and how they were dishonorable in the perspective of Anna Comnenus who was documenting her father reign. Third document described by a crusader was false. Crusaders would lie about their expiditions to make the crusade seem more positive wither they agreed or disagreed upon the crusades actions. In result of the First Crusade they were able to push back the Muslims and reclaim the holy land and aid fellow Christians but failed to assist emperor Alexius reclaim Asia Minor and other former territory from the Seljuk Turks.
The goal of the Crusades was to regain the Holy Lands in the name of the church and drive the Muslims out of Jerusalem.
The Byzantine empire was under attack from the Seljuk Turks and Alexius Comnenus, the emperor of the Byzantine empire, required help from Western Europe. Knights were sent for support, but during the Fourth Crusade, defending the Byzantine empire was not made an important priority, and the Crusaders therefore pillaged Constantinople for their own benefit. Pope Innocent the Third was outraged to hear that the Crusaders destroyed Constantinople, saying in the reprimand of papal legate, “It was your duty to attend to the business of your legation and to give careful consideration, not to the capture of the Empire of Constantinople, but rather to the defense of what is left of the Holy Land…”. Through the quote, it is proved that defending the Holy Land was a higher priority than attacking the Byzantine empire. Furthermore, Pope Innocent the Third did not mention that defending the Byzantine empire was the Crusaders’ ‘business of their legation’ and therefore means that the cause is very trivial, or it has been neglected. Although defending the Byzantine empire was a cause of the Crusades, it did not last long and did not contribute much to the creation of the other
Emperor Justinian of the Eastern Roman Empire, also known as the Byzantine Empire, was one of Rome’s greatest leaders. By building numerous churches, schools, and hospitals throughout the empire, Justinian not only managed to revive Roman society, but he also preserved Roman culture for over a thousand years. Justinian’s brilliant leadership led the Roman Empire to conquer lands in Europe and Africa and expand to its greatest size. Additionally, he unified and strengthened the empire by moving the capital to Constantinople and establishing a single faith. After his death, Justinian left a legacy that allowed Rome to continue thriving. Under Justinian’s rule, Rome flourished into a culturally rich civilization.
The Crusades took place in the Middle East between 1095 and 1291. They were used to gain a leg up on trading, have more land to show hegemony, and to please the gods. Based upon the documents, the Crusades between 1095 and 1291 were caused primarily by religious devotion rather than by the desire for economic and political gain.
Pope Urban II was sought by Alexius Comnenus, a Byzantine Emperor who wanted the papacy to help his army hold off the advancing Seljuk Turks in Asia Minor. The reason for Alexius Comnenus contacting the pope rather than another emperor or monarch wasn’t just the fact they were secular, but because the pope would have more power to persuade the people. The Gregorian movement in 1050-80 was ultimately was responsible for the new instilled power of the papacy’s position over nonreligious rulers. The pope agreed to aid the Byzantine emperor, but he also had his own agenda when it came to the military advances and the new power of his position. The papacy did not intend to only help the Byzantine Empire but to further save all of Christendom from being overrun.
The Crusades have been a heated and debated topic for centuries. The main reason the crusades started was because of religious factors and the promise of indulgences by going to the Holy Land and defending all of Christendom from the infidels (p. 102). This brings us to a second point which is, the personal gain for Christians in the East and an expansion of economic and territory to the East (p. 111). Christians wanted to take back the Holy Land from the Moslems and reclaim it for Christendom. The crusades affected Christian Medieval Europe on every fiber, but were the Christians crusades motivated by religious factors or by bloodlust and plunder?
Throughout the duration of the crusades real motivations shone though on behalf of the Crusaders. Not only did they lack a religious purpose for fighting, but they made the Muslim’s lives complicated and valueless. They were power hungry, land coveting people who fought with non Christian ideals and Morales. It should be clear to anyone and everyone that the prime motivation behind the Crusader’s fighting was power and land which would eventually lead to wealth.
The Crusades were holy wars with the goal of securing Jerusalem for Christian control, rather than Muslim control. After Pope Urban II gave a legendary speech in 1095, Christendom was galvanized into retaking the holy land, Jerusalem. People were so excited to conquest, that a large force, consisting mostly of peasants, could not wait to assist the main force that Pope Urban II was organizing. This impoverished, poorly prepared force attempted to march to Jerusalem. This group would lead what was to be called the People’s Crusade (Murray). This movement was an unadulterated disaster of epic proportions. These peasants pillaged towns of their own and towns of their allied countries, then attacked supporting guards
At the end of the 11th century, Western Europe had emerged as a great power, not yet as strong as the Byzantine Empire or the Islamic Empire of the Middle East and North Africa, however, it had substantial growth in political and religious influence during the Middle Ages. At this time the Byzantine Empire was under constant attack from the Seljuk Turks and many losses had lead to a significant decrease in the Byzantine territories. After the wars with the Turks, years of civil war and chaos followed until Alexius Comnenus, a general in the Byzantine army seized the throne in 1081 and took control of what was left of the Byzantine Empire.
Which was started in 1095 by Pope Claremont. The Crusades were a series of Holy Wars against the Saracens.The reason for the crusades was fought over the ownership of The Holy Land and Jerusalem. The city of Jerusalem had a holy significance to the Christian Religion. There there a total of nine crusades. The first one lasted until 1095-1099. It established the Latin Kingdom that provided land for the crusading knights. These crusades had great impacted the wealth and power of the Catholic Church. It also affected political matters, feudalism, and intellectual
The Age of Reform throughout 1825-1850 was a great turning point for American society. The ideas and beliefs throughout the reform movements greatly expanded the democratic ideals. Reform movements in the United States sought to express ideas through religion and education, start movements through abolition and temperance acts, expand beliefs by caring for the insane, and take a stand by speaking up for personal rights .
Contrary to many commonly held notions about the first crusade, in his book, The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading, Jonathan Riley-Smith sets out to explain how the idea of crusading thought evolved in the first crusade. In his book, Riley-Smith sets out five main arguments to show how these ideas of crusading evolved. Firstly, he argues that Pope Urban’s original message was conventional, secondly that a more positive reaction was drawn from the laity (due to the ideas surrounding Jerusalem), thirdly, that the original message of crusading had changed because of the horrible experiences of the first crusaders, fourth, that due to these experiences the crusaders developed their own concept of what a crusade was, and lastly, that these ideas were refined by (religious) writers and turned into an acceptable form of theology. Riley-Smith makes excellent points about the crusade; however, before one can delve directly into his argument, one must first understand the background surrounding the rise of the first crusade.
There are various views on the motivation of the crusaders, and many of them can be backed up by historical data. Some of the incentives offered by Pope to the crusaders were: exemption from taxes, freeing prisoners, or offering extraordinary indulgences remitting all punishments due to sin for those who died on the crusade. Crusaders of the upper classes were very often leaving their estates with regents and taking part in the crusades to fight in the name of Christ, acquire riches, fame and land. The crusaders of the lower classes were also fighting in the name of Christ and at the same time very often they were looking for relief from their miserable lives, and wanted to better themselves abroad. The view of the crusades and crusaders differ depending on commentator’...
The Crusades reach different aspects of history from war, politics and economics to religions and cultural diversity. A crusade is defined as a remedial enterprise undertaken with zeal and enthusiasm by Merriam-Webster.com. Based upon the research on crusades and holy wars, it stated that in 1095, Pope Urban II sent out knights of West Europe to help the Christians that were dominated by Muslims in Near East. The Crusades is told to be understood better as a series of holy wars triggered by religious powers fighting for upper hand of ruling. Thomas F. Madden, in his published literary work The Concise History of the Crusades, explains the crusades were essentially “a war against Muslims for the defense of the Christian people,” even though
The Crusaders had a hard and long journey ahead of them, but they did not give up because they fought for something they believe in. The journey to retake their land was long and treacherous because they could not travel by water (Trueman 1). They had