Compare And Contrast The Biological And Psychoanalytic Perspective

1283 Words3 Pages

Psychology as a diverse and applied discipline studies the mental functions and behaviour organisms through various perspectives. This essay examines two of these perspectives, namely the Psychoanalytic and the Behaviourist perspectives. A detailed description of these two perspectives will be provided including the major proponents of the theories, key concepts used to understand and interpret human nature, the major causal factors of human behaviour, the principle focus and methods of discovery used to investigate human behaviour as well the major strengths and limitations of each perspective. This essay will explore how both the behaviourist and the psychoanalytic perspectives are able to describe Thabani’s behaviour.

Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) …show more content…

Psychoanalysis focuses predominantly on Thabani’s childhood and the various losses and abandonments that he experienced. His current anxiety and depression would be linked to the loss of his primary attachment figures. The loss of his father at a very young age has resulted in Thabani being unable to have a fatherly figure within his life. Furthermore, the loss of is mother to illness caused severe distress for the young boy. The emotions and fears linked too these traumatic losses would link to his unconscious mind therefore altering his behaviour. In addition, Thabani has experienced deprivation throughout his life. He grew up in a shack, he was deprived of parental figures and he often went to school hungry. Psychoanalytic theorists would explain, that these deprivations, experiences and unconscious thoughts are driving forces behind Thabani’s strange behaviour. It is evident, that the loss of contact between Thabani and his grandmother has caused great anxiety. Weakness of this unscientific approach is that it is reliant on accuracy of the interpretations of the therapist and openness of Thabani to receiving these interpretations. Furthermore, the unconscious is unseen and can therefore not be studied …show more content…

Consequently, people are viewed as responders rather than being self- directing or mentalistic. Behaviourists purport that people can only make responses that they have learned, and they make them when the stimulus conditions are suitable. The stimulus response paradigm is therefore the basic pattern of all human learning. People respond in predictable ways to any particular stimulus depending on what they have learned through experience (Thompson & Rudolph, 2000). Skinner viewed the human being as an organism who learns patterns of behaviour, catalogues them within a repertoire, and repeats them at a later date (Thompson & Rudolph, 2000:217). More specifically, the human being learns a specific response when a rewarding conditions follows the action. The behaviourist’s focus is in the science of behaviour as it relates to biology. As human behaviour is learned, any or all behaviour can be unlearned and replaced by new behaviour. The behaviourist focuses on observable events that, when they become undesirable, can be

Open Document