Compare And Contrast Harrison Bergeron Vs Search

378 Words1 Page

Some advanced classes are being eliminated or criticized at some schools. People think they are elitist or undemocratic. Advanced kids need some work that is their level but at the same time the lower kids will feel like they’re not smart. I know this from personal experience. In elementary school, there was a program called SEARCH where the “smart” kids would go off one day every week and do things like dissect small sharks or play games. I felt as if I was not smart because I wasn’t in SEARCH. My best friend was in SEARCH and she would say things like “we need work that is our level”. Now I realize that even though I’m not in SEARCH that I’m still smart. I think advanced kids should have their own work in the same classroom so the other …show more content…

I don’t think it would eliminate competition. In fact, I think it would only make things worse. If nobody could be better than anybody else, people would want to break the rules and push the limits. In “Harrison Bergeron”, Hazel and George’s son Harrison is according to the text, “He is a genius and an athlete, is under-handicapped, and should be regarded as extremely dangerous.”. He is a genius, and athlete, and strong. He wants to stop the government. According to the text, “has just escaped from jail, where he was held on suspicion of plotting to overthrow the government.”. He wants to break the rules because there are rules. If there were no rules, no one would want to break them because there would be no fun in it. Is excellence a good thing? I have never been mocked for having a good grade but I have been jealous of someone who got a good grade. When one of my friends gets a good grade I feel happy for them and I congratulate them. But that doesn’t mean I’m not jealous. So, is excellence a good thing? Excellence can be a good thing but in a world where everyone is equal, excellence is not even a thing because no one can be better than anyone

Open Document