Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Term paper on war poetry
Features of war poetry in English literature
Term paper on war poetry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The two poems ‘Anzac’ by John Brereton and ‘Who's for the Game?’ by Jessie Pope are both written around the time of World War I. The two poems contain both differences and similarities in how they convey attitudes to war some ways that this is achieved are language, structure and the themes of the poems. One way the two poems differ is in the theme and tone of the poems. In Jessie Pope’s poem she has produced war propaganda which is designed to encourage people to go to war. This means that she is unlikely to talk negatively about war. As shown in the poem by the quotation ‘who’ll toe the line for the signal to ‘go’?’ This implies that the war is a race because the signal ‘go’ is often associated with the start of a race. Furthermore, the …show more content…
‘Who's for the Game?’ is 15 lines while ‘Anzac’ is 22 lines. This may be a metaphor as Brereton might be suggesting, in his poem ‘Anzac’, that the war is long. Whereas ‘Who's for the Game?’ is a much shorter poem suggesting that Pope was trying to show that the war will be short and over soon which fits with propaganda as more people will be happy to fight if they think the war will be over soon. These two poems also have different rhyme schemes with ‘Who's for the Game?’ using an ABAB rhyme scheme, rhyming words every other line, while ‘Anzac’ uses an AABB rhyme scheme, rhyming words in pairs. The rhyme scheme in ‘Who's for the Game?’ rhymes lines that are associated with bravery such as ‘who’ll give his country a hand?’ with lines that imply fear ‘and who wants a seat in the stand?’ This technique makes the reader compare the two options with the bravery on obviously being sensationalised to encourage people to join the war. However one similarity between the two poems is that they are both one long stanza. As you can see the two poems differ in rhyme scheme and length which means that they can create different tones to the …show more content…
While in the poem ‘Who's for the Game?’ by Jessie Pope euphemistic language is used, which can be illustrated by the description of war as a ‘show.’ This is an example of euphemistic language as shows are form of entertainment that many aspire to perform in. Furthermore, shows are often associated with glamour and luxurious lifestyles. This shows how the poet wants to portray this poem has fun for everybody. This shows how Pope feels that war is an enjoyable experience which is family friendly like most shows. Additionally, the poet uses multiple poetic techniques such as personal address ‘And she’s calling for you.’ The poet also uses other techniques such as metaphors, by describing the war as a game. The use of these techniques show how Pope wishes to spread the message, war is great, to all those around her. On the other hand the poem ‘Anzac’ by John Brereton uses dysphemistic language to create a depressing atmosphere. This can be illustrated by the quotation ‘Their own hearts drummed them to the fight.’ This example shows how John feels that the war was scary. This is implied by the fact that a heart beating hard against the chest, like a drum, is a reaction often associated with fear and anxiety. In addition to this Brereton also uses other poetic techniques such as onomatopoeia shown by the quotation ‘clang’, assonance which can be illustrated by this quotation ‘noble hope’ and repetition depicted by
Over many centuries, Poetry and song has been a way for people to explore their feelings, thoughts and questions about War & Peace. Rupert Brooke's “The Soldier” and Cold Chisel’s “Khe Sanh” provide two different insights into the nature of war. . “The Soldier” conveys a message of bravery for soldiers to go into war and fight while “Khe sanh” conveys a message about post-traumatic stress and the horrible factors of coming back into civilization after war.
Good morning, Ms Dowdeswell and 9b, today let us have a look at how much have contemporary historians challenged the ANZAC legend, my hypothesis is some contemporary historians do challenge the ANZAC legend to a great extent. Wait, what is ANZAC? ANZAC is the acronym formed from the initial letters of the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps. This was the formation in which Australian and New Zealand soldiers in Egypt were grouped before the landing on Gallipoli in April 1915. Everything started with WWI. But, how WWI began? Well, the direct cause of WWI was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo on 28 June 1914. However, historians feel Militarism (Main),Alliances, Imperialism and Nationalism are the main factors which contributed to the rivalry between the Great powers that allowed war on such a wide-scale to break out. As we know during WWI, Europe was divided into two alliances — Triple Entente (Britain, Russia and France) and
The powerful poem ‘Weapons Training’ showcases a sergeant, through malicious words, guiding his troops. However it is through ‘Homecoming’, where Dawe exposes the brutal hopelessness brought forth by the futility of war. Therefore it can be seen that war has an emotional toll on both families and the soldiers. Both poems have a recurring message that all war does is bring loss, death and mourning, showcasing Dawes strong opinions about a futile
Through the meaning behind these poems are different. They each share a similar point of view which is that they are talking to young men about war. For example in The Call Pope expressed the glory that young men would get by going to war in stanza three, Who'll earn the Empire's thanks / Will you my laddie? (17-18) Jessie Pope beliefs on war is that by young men going to fight for their country they will be treated as heroes. If they chose not to join they would be considered disrespecting their country. Furthermore, Wilfred Owen does the same thing in Dulce et Decorum Est though his views on war are inverted as opposed to what Jessie Pope believes. He personally feels the war is not the best thing that young men should to do for gratitude
Tim O’Brien states in his novel The Things They Carried, “The truths are contradictory. It can be argued, for instance, that war is grotesque. But in truth war is also beauty. For all its horror, you can’t help but gape at the awful majesty of combat” (77). This profound statement captures not only his perspective of war from his experience in Vietnam but a collective truth about war across the ages. It is not called the art of combat without reason: this truth transcends time and can be found in the art produced and poetry written during the years of World War I. George Trakl creates beautiful images of the war in his poem “Grodek” but juxtaposes them with the harsh realities of war. Paul Nash, a World War I artist, invokes similar images in his paintings We are Making a New World and The Ypres Salient at Night. Guilaume Apollinaire’s writes about the beautiful atrocity that is war in his poem “Gala.”
From sunrise to sunset, day after day, war demolishes men, cities, and hope. War has an effect on soldiers like nothing else, and sticks with them for life. The damage to a generation of men on both sides of the war was inestimable. Both the novel All Quiet on the Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque, and the poem “I Have a Rendezvous with Death,” by Alan Seeger, demonstrate the theme of a lost generation of men, mentally and physically, in war through diction, repetition, and personification.
War can not be fully described in just words, humans have to experience it to know how it really is. In passage 1 from “The Things They Carried”, a fictional memoir by Tim O'brien, the narrator describes the contradictory nature of war. O’brien uses rhetorical strategies to characterize the experience of war. O’brien uses imagery, anaphora, and paradox to guide readers understand the experience of war through fictional writing.
Autobiographies, diaries, letters, official records, photographs and poems are examples of primary sources from World War One. The two primary sources analyzed in this essay are the poems, “Anthem for Doomed Youth” by Wilfred Owen and “In Flanders Fields” by John McCrae. Primary sources are often personal, written from the limited perspective of a single individual. It is very difficult for the author to capture their own personal experience, while incorporating the involvement and effects of other events happening at the same time. Each piece of writing studied describes the author’s perception of the war. Both of the poems intend to show to grave reality of war, which often was not realized until the soldiers reach the frontlines. The poems were both written at battle within two years of each other. However, the stark difference between the two poems is astonishing. “Anthem for Doomed Youth” gives a much different impression than “In Flanders Field” despite the fact that both authors were in the same war and similar circumstances. The first two lines in “In Flanders Fields” “…the poppies blow, Between the crosses, row on row.” are an image o...
World War One was a massive event. It affected millions of people from all walks of life, and inspired countless written pieces. Nevertheless, without being there, it is impossible to truly be able to tell what the war is like. Therefore the use of setting is very important in giving the reader an idea of the circumstance. This is not to say that everyone is in agreement over how the war should be displayed. Quite one the contrary, the two Poems “In Flanders Fields” and “Dulce et Decorum Est” use their settings to create two very contrasting images of human conflict.
Ultimately, we have two poems which can be compared on the grounds of their subject, but are poles apart regarding their message. The structure of these poems is not what would be typically expected from a war poem, but are structured on the basis of these typical structures in order to create some sense of familiarity. Brooke’s poem expands on this familiarity while Owen attempts to deliberately sabotage it. In regards to content, Brooke shows throughout his perception of the nobility of dying for one’s country, whilst Owen uses all of his poetic techniques to show the opposite.
Also it is comparing the war to a game, which is a euphemism as well as a metaphor. It is a euphemism because war is a very serious, dangerous matter; whereas a game is something that people enjoy and never get seriously injured in. By using this euphemism, Jessie Pope - the poet – lessens the severity of war, and makes her readers’ think of it as enjoyable, and something that they want to do.
Both Stephen Crane's "Do Not Weep, Maiden, For War Is Kind" and Wilfred Owen's "Dulce et Decorum Est" use vivid images, diction rich with connotation, similes, and metaphors to portray the irony between the idealized glory of war and the lurid reality of war. However, by looking at the different ways these elements are used in each poem, it is clear that the speakers in the two poems are soldiers who come from opposite ends of the spectrum of military ranks. One speaker is an officer and the other is a foot soldier. Each of the speakers/soldiers is dealing with the repercussions from his own realities of the horror of war based on his duty during the battle.
In the poem “Who’s for the game?”, the author Jessie Pope uses an extended metaphor to toy with prideful behaviour to insinuate a challenge for men, in order to convince them to enlist for the Great war. The metaphor “Who’s for the game”, compares the great war to a enjoyable activity. Most games are usually fun and an exciting pass time that many people are eager to partake in. The comparison of a thrilling activity makes the war sound more appealing to the men who are considering to join the war effort. In the quote “Who’ll grip and tackle the job unafraid.”, Pope uses vocabulary that is associated with sports to bring an uplifting and an exciting tone to the poem. This is a crucial poetic device in the poem that assists to convince men to
The simple definition of war is a state of armed competition, conflict, or hostility between different nations or groups; however war differs drastically in the eyes of naive children or experienced soldiers. Whether one is a young boy or a soldier, war is never as easy to understand as the definition. comprehend. There will inevitably be an event or circumstance where one is befuddled by the horror of war. For a young boy, it may occur when war first breaks out in his country, such as in “Song of Becoming.” Yet, in “Dulce et Decorum Est” it took a man dying in front of a soldier's face for the soldier to realize how awful war truly is. Both “Song of Becoming” and “Dulce et Decorum Est” are poems about people experiencing the monstrosity of war for the first time. One is told from the perspective of young boys who were stripped of their joyful innocence and forced to experience war first hand. The other is from the perspective of a soldier, reflecting on the death of one of his fellow soldiers and realizing that there is nothing he can do to save him. While “Song of Becoming” and “Dulce et Decorum Est” both focus on the theme of the loss of innocence, “Song of Becoming” illustrates how war affects the lives of young boys, whereas “Dulce et Decorum Est” depicts the affect on an experienced soldier.
The presence of clashing opinions and beliefs results in unknown reality to be overpowered by false perceptions. These misconceptions result in costly effects but shape the aggression and instinct of humanity. Society often reflects on this difference of expectation and reality through many forms of literature. World War I was full of conflicting and evolving opinions within it’s poetry from the people in the battle and those back at home. The events of the war, life in the trenches, and views from the home front are reflected upon in World War I poetry. The Call written by Jessie Pope incorporates repetition of thought-provoking questions to convince men to join the war. Dulce