Communication played a very important part in our group project. One of the ways we stayed connected was to call group meeOur goal as a team was to get an A on the group project. Because my grade wasn't to to good I was fully committed to the team's goal. We decided to split the groups work up into parts. So each individual had our own assignments. I was the one who assigned the groups work, so i was happy with that individual assignments. We did it this was so it could be easier to accomplish our team goal. tings every once in awhile. When we called group meetings we would all work on the project together so we could check each other's work. Another way we stayed connected was through text messages. When we couldn't meet or a member was too busy to attend a meeting we just turned to our group chat. The group chat allowed us to stay connected without physically being with each other. Because of the effort put forth by every group member I knew we was going to get a good grade on the speech …show more content…
Whenever we’re in group meetings or someone just not getting their work finished overall then the group member will help them get back on track. If the task was too difficult for anyone then another would help them gather their information to write down on the paper. Gathering information wasn't easy because there are not a lot of creditable sources out here about our topic. Because they’re not many credible sources we had to really pay attention to what sources we were getting it from and if it was credible or
“Role conflict can arises when these expectations about how to play a role or set of roles are inconsistent in some way” (Losh, pg. 89). Role conflict is a type of social conflict caused from an individual being forced to take on separate and incompatible roles. Role conflicts usually occur when an individual becomes torn between separate roles for different organizations or groups or within an organization, when an individual is asked to perform multiple roles in the same group. An employee with both work and management roles in a department, for example, assumes the conflicting roles of the supervisor and co-worker. Many feel as though most role conflicts occur because of multiple obligations to different groups role conflicts can also occur within a one organization. When individuals have various conflicting responsibilities role conflicts tend to cause friction and frustration depending of the personality of the individual. While conducting my research I saw a lot of this going ground from the Customer Assistant Specialist’s, Medical Communication Specialist’s, Consultant Nurse’s, Pharmacists and especially the floaters. Many of the employees look extremely frustrated and overwhelmed. It appears that even though we are complying with client needs we are hurting our employees at the end of day. We are forcing our employees to basically handle 2-3 positions in 1 to make the client satisfied. The client request for someone to be online all day but wants them to manage to do call backs as well. That task is impossible considering the fact we have such a high call volume. The problem appears to be there are not enough people on this particular project. We are spreading our employees to thin. We a...
Communication Skills in Group Interaction Abram maslow (1908) - deficiency needs for respecting and valuing individuals. Tuckman (1965) m- four stages of group reformation The actual interaction - this took place 18/12/10.30am Seating pattern - dominating the group interaction Seating pattern - effective group communication Neil moonie (1996) - advanced health and social care ONE TO ONE INTERACTION Martin Seligman (1975) - helplessness in communication (2) Actual interaction - taken place on 4/02/03 at 2.30pm (1) Neil moonie - advanced health and social care www.mental health.com COMMUNICATION SKILLS WITHIN GROUP INTERACTION INTRODUCTION Communication is one of the most imperative things of being a human being. If we were not able to communicate, we would not be able to interact with others; therefore we would most likely be unsuccessful in leading our lives to their full potential. There are two types of communication, which are verbal and non verbal.
As I planed to take this class, I thought this course would be like all other general education courses. I believed that it would be of little use to me. However, after attending the first class, my view has changed completely. I applied each and every theory to my life.
I think our group worked well together. We got along nicely and did the work we were supposed to do. During collaboration, what worked was going downstairs or into the collaboration room. It really helped us focus on what we needed to get done. Sometimes, however, we wouldn't do our work and just goof off, but we ended up getting all of our work done on time. Some strategies that helped our
Team communication is vital in many aspects of our professions. It is human nature to coexist with others in various roles: be it in the military, emergency medicine, football, or even school. The American Heritage Dictionary (n.d.) defines communication as the exchange of thoughts, messages, or information, as by speech, signals, writing, or behavior.
I thought the communication for the group I was in was pretty good. We worked together on the entire project and no one shot each others ideas or suggestions down, but we instead listened to what each other had to say and discussed our opinions as a group. Even when we would disagree on something I believe that we all treated each other respectfully and tried to either come up with a compromise or a majority rule of how most of the group felt on a particular issue.
Groupthink is an attractive theory by the virtue of its ability to explain irrational decisions made by rational and intelligent groups of individuals. However, the theory does not predict group behavior and merely reexamines past events and applies a rubric of eight “symptoms” that comprise Groupthink. These eight symptoms include illusions of invulnerability, collective rationalization, belief in inherent morality, stereotyped views of out-groups, direct pressure on dissenters, self-censorship, illusion of unanimity, and self-appointed “mind-guards” (McCauley 1998). Illusion of invulnerability occurs when members overestimate their own ability and irrationally believe that everything will work out for the group because it is unique or different. The belief in inherent morality is when members automatically believe their cause is justified, without any proper basis. Collective rationalization occurs when members dismiss any mistakes or challenging views by creating false and often logically flawed explanations. Out-group stereotyping describes the group’s tendency to disregard all opposing ideas and arbitrarily denounce people outside of the group. Self-censorship is responsible for discouraging members from talking about their ideas and findings if the ideas challenge status quo. Illusion of unanimity is reached when members falsely believe that group silence signifies that the group is in agreement. Direct pressure on dissenters is the fear within the group that disagreeing signifies disloyalty. Lastly, self-appointed mind-guards are members who voluntarily prevent the group from discussing controversial topics or ideas.
In order to evaluate my role within the group, it is important to identify what makes a group. A group must firstly consist of more than three members, “Two members have personal relationships; with three or more there is a change in quality” of the personal relationship. (Bion 1961, p26) The group must have a common purpose or a goal in order to succeed. Having now completed my group work task, I can look back and reflect upon the process that my group went through to get to the presentation end point.
In the environment today, it is not unusual to see people working in teams to accomplish certain goals and tasks. During our youth, parents and teachers encourage us through various methods to work as part of a team. Whether a sports team, classroom team, or after school activities, parents and teachers and other authority figures start the introduction of working in teams and teaching the value of being able to work together to accomplish a common goal. As people progress through the various stages of their lives, everyone continues to strive to communicate. Communication is a part of everyday life. It may be overlooked in some areas, but when dealing with a team environment, communication is vital. One fact that holds true is that communication can either make or break any team. Lack of communication can lead to confusion within a team as well as a lack of production on a common task. This paper will examine the many different aspects of teams with an emphasis on how effective communication can allow a team to accomplish set goals. When forming a team some things to consider are the challenges of teamwork, the benefits of teamwork, and how one can enhance his performance in the team in order to realize more benefits in regard to effective communication.
From the beginning, where we were unfamiliar with each other and became a team, my team and I had started to learn each other name and getting to know each other. Throughout each meeting, we slowly start to feel more comfortable and open minded with each other. Not only are we getting familiar with each other, each meeting that was held we progress of becoming an effective team member, we learn our strengths and weaknesses of everyone. During the meetings, we learn many concepts from the textbook, “Communicating in Small Groups: Principles and Practices” by Steven A. Beebe and John T. Masterson. We were able to learn different types of concept in the textbook and utilized it as a team to complete certain tasks. The three concepts that impacted my team and I are human
Group work is something I have always been a big fan of because you get to talk and engage with your group members, and by doing so we were able to all get on the same page. As soon as we compromised on a topic to use for our project, we then divided it into 4 equal and important
Groupthink is the communications theory that addresses, “ defective decision making on the part of a cohesive decision-making group in which loyalty to real or perceived group norms take precedence over independent, critical judgment” (Redd & Mintz, 2013). The main idea behind the theory of groupthink is that when participants in a group discussion do not want to disrupt the group, they will in turn reframe from suggesting other solutions to a problem. By not contributing other suggestions, better solutions may be overlooked and this leads to poor decision making in general. In order for the best possible solution to be found, participants in the group need to feel like they can ask questions and discuss their own personal opinions and beliefs.
Based on the small group that I joined in communication class, I will talk about what is working well and what is getting in the way in our group. Then I will discuss about what I can do to improve the group and the things about group project if there is a chance for a start over again. At last, I am also going to talk about what I think that I learned is an important lesson in this semester.
our thought process, and how we contribute to the process of group work. This involves a
Working together with other people for an assignment can be a challenging task in some cases but luckily, I worked well with my group members. The decisions we made were anonymous although we paced ourselves individually when it came to completing our separate parts of the essay. As a group I believe that we connected well on an interpersonal level as all four of us were able to make alterations to any problem together . Furthermore, we did not give each other a chance to get angry at one another as we knew that this would only cause conflict that would disrupt our flow as a group. There was an equal divide in the amount of work that we all did; our contributions were fair and no one was lacking behind. In addition, my group members were great at keeping each other informed if one of us were not able to attend a group meeting; emails were sent out informing us what we missed and ideas that were formulated. Everyone in my group worked according to deadlines and in synchronization with each other; we did not have to nag anyone to complete work or wait on a member to complete their task.