Coconut Telegraph Case

416 Words1 Page

According to IAS 18, revenue is defined as “the gross inflow of economic benefits during the period arising in the course of the ordinary activities of an entity when those inflows result in increases in equity, other than increases relating to contributions from equity participants” (2012).
Generally, revenue is recognized when it is probable and reasonably estimable. While this definition of revenue exists under both methods of accounting, the current revenue requirements in IFRS can be quite difficult to apply to multipart transactions. Because IAS 18 provides very limited guidance on topics like multi-elements arrangements and software recognition revenue, some companies have developed their IFRS accounting policies by referring to parts …show more content…

In the Coconut Telegraph case, since one of the criteria mentioned above was met, both the February and May 2012 arrangements should be accounted for as a single transaction. Because that single contract contains various performance obligations, Coconut Telegraph has to allocate the revenue based on the unit’s fair market value of the standalone price (IFRS 15). According to these rules, the prices are allocated in a similar way as presented under GAAP requirements. Thus, for the May agreement, as of April 30, 2012, the amount of recognized revenue totals $10, 429, while the deferred revenue totals $1,429. The balance sheet of May 1, 2012 records a total of $10, 571 cumulative recognized revenues, as well as a total of $5,929 deferred

Open Document