Coca Cola Groupthink Case Study

892 Words2 Pages

Coca-Cola’s Groupthink Blunder in the 80’s
We learned about the phenomenon of Groupthink, which is a group usually makes decisions that are proven disastrous and in hindsight people agree that it is flawed from the onset. Groupthink as we have learned can happen anywhere from being with friends which we call peer pressure, to companies, corporations and especially government institutions. For our learning journal assignment, we have to find and read or own examples of groupthink disasters and the one that came to mind to me was Coca-Cola’s changing of the Coca-Cola’s recipe in the 80’s. The question that popped in my mind is, is that an example of groupthink decision making?
Coca-Cola’s New Coke
Coca-Cola was still the market leader in the …show more content…

The first sign that Coca-Cola’s executives had of groupthink symptom is they bought into the believe that people not picking their product over Pepsi’s is that there is something wrong with Coca-Cola and therefore need to be change somehow, so in the beginning they already made a collective rationalization that they need to change their product. The second symptom they have was they had the illusion of invulnerability, because they spend so much money on research to find a new formula of Coke that beat Pepsi in blind taste tests. The third symptoms of course is that they stereotyped their own loyal customers and that they will accept anything just because it has Coca-Cola written on it. The other symptoms of groupthink could possibly be in play also like self-censorship, direct pressure on dissenters, illusion of unanimity and self-appointed mindguards, I’m sure at least one person somewhere thought or even said changing our product was a bad idea but self-censored or shut up because of pressure and or how pressure from the top to find a new formula caused the researcher to find something new and ignore the people that said they find the old coke just fine thereby being mindguard. In …show more content…

By the leader and or leaders not stating that they need a new formula, members would have probably come up with ideas such as introducing a new product instead tailored to Pepsi drinkers taste and not tinker with a winning product already. They definitely should have used a devil’s advocate to argue why their changing the formula was a bad idea, I’m sure the point of what about the current Coca-Cola’s consumers that already like and drink Coke would have come up. The most important thing was of course that they should have considered their already loyal consumers views, and not have focused so much on winning such a narrow group of Pepsi consumers, better research through surveys of their loyal customers should have revealed their feelings about a change in their beloved product and that the customer is king and not the executives when it comes to success or failure of a

More about Coca Cola Groupthink Case Study

Open Document