Cloning Argument Analysis

248 Words1 Page

Scientists claim that these clones are in fact, human. Therefore, these clones would have rights, meaning “normal” humans couldn't take their organs without consent. The university of Utah asks the question “why clone?”, and toward the end of their article, they state, “far-fetched views describe farms filled with clones whose organs are harvested for transplant- a truly horrific idea” (“why clone”). Implying that the idea was nixed as the public would find this evil and would never approve of cloning. Also proving that clones would have rights, as they wouldn’t just be killed off after the transplant. The main idea for cloning is that it could be used for perfect organ transplants. In the article, “Animal Cloning-A Primer in Cloning and

Open Document