Cloning In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein '

1849 Words4 Pages

Looking Into Our Future's Hands
In every aspect of our lives we have a choice that can determine our dishonorable effort or the ability to become expertise. However, we all stick in the same identical path known as our religious beliefs that tell us who our creator truly is by scripture. Scientific theories will never apprehend the way we support our day to day lives, case in point, the creature can be exceeding or unfavorable in any emotional point of view coming upon a human. Victor Frankenstein took on the challenge to create a masterpiece to only look beastly upon everyone's eyes, after all, that was not the case when the creature arose beneath him. Scientists establish a new way of creating, such as cloning or in the world of genetic engineering, …show more content…

Victor had several moral choices to select on, which is to play with God and create a human like figure, or forbid natural philosophy and walk along a new journey. However, Victor chooses to create a new creature not thinking it would need to be cherished or loved by his own father. Victor made the creature with love and passion, but just like every single newborn baby, it needs its parents there to support and show emotional relations. The creature responds with, "This obligation is in part to be just to me, and do what you can as father to improve my lot." (Shelley 164). Creating a companion or not for the creature, Victor needs to prove his passion and emotions he has for his creation. Although, he forbids Frankenstein's obligation which changes the moral of the story to conquer revenge …show more content…

His act of science would question if cloning was a practical and morally acceptable thing to do. Firstly, even attempting to clone insults God's role as a creator. Showing full determination, Aldona says, "Christian, however, feel that we have no right to play the role of God, because He is the only one Creator and act of creation depends on Him." (Zbikowska 13-16). We know God's role is to create men, women, animals and nature in his image in the way he sees perfect, not the way we see ourselves as perfect. God has the intention of making us, and when others try to mimic him it deteriorates his role in the world. Aside from the idea that cloning is insulting to God, it can also hurt others. Even though cloning has been developing for the past few decades, it is still a fairly unsuccessful procedure. In most cases, cloning is successful only less than one percent of the time. Moreover, successful clones often have problems with their body and are subject to a short lifespan ridden with health problems. This hurts the person or animal cloned rather than to help them, making cloning an immoral

More about Cloning In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein '

Open Document