Circle Of Deceit

1884 Words4 Pages

We currently live in an era of a media takeover. In recent years, technological advancements and new media outlets have created an environment where a good story sells better than a true story. Therefore, it opens the debate over the possible ethical obligations of the media when reporting new. The media’s influence and power has been steadily increasing, now so strong that it could ruin someone's life and career overnight. Therefore, the question is raised of the level of honesty required from the source when reporting a story. The 2010 documentary Tabloid by Errol Morris and the 1981 movie, Circle of Deceit by Volker Schlöndorff, each explore the debate over media honesty differently. Tabloid presents the impact of a media bias, whereas Circle of Deceit exemplifies the medias attempts to deceive viewers with lies to manufacture a better story. Ultimately, both movies successfully advanced the philosophical question of whether or not an objective story can exist. Volker Schlöndorff's Circle of Deceit explores the moral dilemmas that German journalist Georg Laschen encounters when he travels to Beirut. At the …show more content…

Instead, the public has become more fixated on the culture of opinions and therefore subjects themselves to the influence of fixed mindsets. According to Circle of Deceit, we can assume that all news outlets are perpetuating a certain image which encourages a pro-Palestine attitude by Laschen and other Germans. Unfortunately, similar evidence can be seen today. News reports and television talk shows create an environment where listening to opinions of others evolved into an enjoyable pastime. Everyday, newspapers, websites and talk shows give their viewers an overload of personal biases. Whether it be an op-ed page on climate change in the Boston Globe or an opening monologue by Megyn Kelly about Donald Trump, the source sells a certain opinion to

Open Document