Charles Lawlor And Akihito Suzuki And Sontag's

1334 Words3 Pages

The historical gaze has continually reinvented the history of Tuberculosis, interpreting its connections to culture and society in a myriad of different ways. Particular interest has been paid to the Romantic Era, historically framed from the late eighteenth to nineteenth century, and the peculiar relationship that was foraged between society and Consumption (the Romantic era’s term for Tuberculosis). In categorizing the impact that Consumption had on society and individuals, historians have utilized different frameworks of analysis to identify key causal factors and evidence to explain the extent in which Consumption was entangled with everyday life. Thus, this essay engages in a comparative analysis of the work of Charles Lawlor and Akihito …show more content…

This essay explores the relationships between social, cultural, epidemiological, economic causal factors that led to the romantic perception of Consumption. In addition, Lawlor and Suzuki engage in the contemporary intellectual framing of Consumption by problematized Susan Sontag’s theory of illness and social metaphor within her work Illness as Metaphor. Sontag suggests that the existence of the Consumptive identifiers, like pale skin, low-grade fever, listlessness etcetera, occurred simultaneously with social metaphors of romanticizing Consumption. Lawlor and Suzuki challenge this notion by stating that the physical epidemiological identifiers are the building blocks in which metaphor are created, rather than metaphor and physical identifiers always simultaneously existing . Thus, Sontag’s initial theory inadequately represents how diagnostic indicators of illness and social metaphor are related . Through challenging Sontag’s application of social metaphor, Lawlor and Suzuki can critically analyze the cultural meaning of Consumption throughout its history. Allowing them to reconstruct the socio-cultural causal factors that created the consumptive aesthetic in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and …show more content…

In their social analysis of Consumption, Lawlor and Suzuki challenge the regular periodization of consumptive aesthetics by historically periodizing its origins in the early eighteenth century rather than the late eighteenth century. Lawlor and Suzuki identify that before the Romantic perception of Consumption, conceptions of the disease were based in classical medicine, attributing the illness to “the accumulation of putrid blood in the lungs, the corrosion of the organ by ulcerous pus, and the subsequent emaciation of the body”. Culturally, the framing of the disease was still influenced by the garish medical framing, but it was balanced socially, through socially cultiviated images of the heroic death originating in the classical period . This social framing, according to Lawlor and Suzuki, placed Consumption as an ‘other’ in the collective imagining of the disease, refuting Sontag’s theory that the consumptive aesthetic as social metaphor has not always existed within the social perception of Consumption as a disease. Lawlor and Suzuki argue in the Romantic period, that social metaphors changed through a process of aestheticization of Consumption which took place over several years. This allowed for the social conception of the disease to transition from the social interpretation of Consumption as an ‘other’ to having it

Open Document