Charity Begins at Home

683 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Charity begins at home do you agree or disagree

Charity Begins at Home

Many people may think that charity should begin at home but then again

many people do not. It all depends on what people define as “home” it

could mean your own house, your community (in my case Wymondham), the

wider community (in my case Norfolk) or even Britain. Personally I

take my home as my house but as far as charity goes I would probably

say that it is also your community. Many Christians would possibly

take everyone as the start of their charity because like in the

parable of The Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37), they believe that

everybody should be helped if they need it no matter who they are.

There are many plus points that suggest that you should aid people,

here are some reasons why people may do it: Many Christians feel that

it is their duty to help the less fortunate. In the Bible it tells

them that you must help the poor in Luke 6:20-21 it says that the poor

a special therefore you must aid them when they need it. Christians

will also follow the Golden rule which is to treat others as you would

want to be treated. A lot of people will be concerned that there are

thousands of people dying each day and when they see things on

television because they have been brought up with morals they will

have a feeling of guilt and therefore feel that they should help the

less fortunate because they are helpless and are in desperate need of

aid.

There are also bad points to contradict all the good ones here are

some reasons why people do not give to charity: If you do not give to

a registered charity then there is no guarantee that your money is

going to someone that actually needs it. Many people believe that

people abroad should ask their fellow countrymen and their government

to help them and not to rely on us giving them aid. Also a lot of

people think that we should boost our medical infrastructure to the

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of The Singer Solution To World Poverty

    1276 Words  | 3 Pages

    “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” by Peter Singer is a persuasive article trying to influence people to donate money to save children’s lives. Peter Singer stated, “Evolutionary psychologists tell us that human nature just isn’t sufficiently altruistic to make it plausible that many people will sacrifice so much for strangers… they would be wrong to draw moral conclusions to that fact”. First, Singer tells a story about a retired school teacher who doesn’t have extra money. Dora, the school teacher, is given a chance to make a thousand dollars by walking a homeless child to a house, in which she was given the address for. She then walks the child to the house, and then later Dora’s neighbors tell her that the child was probably killed

    Read More

  • Reevaluating Charity: A Radical Approach

    870 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout his essay, Singer argues that we must reject the common sense view of giving to charity. The common sense view of giving to charity is one that is supererogatory; it is not obligated for us

    Read More

  • The Piety Myth

    618 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the article “God’s Heart for the Poor,” Dr. Jay W. Richards, a famous author, claims that Christians should have both heart and mind in order to help the poor and become a true, good neighbor. He uses some Bible verses to teach the readers about the importance of being a good neighbor and uses The Piety Myth to explain how Christians should “exercise prudence” and connects this concept to the economics.

    Read More

  • Singer Cullity

    1687 Words  | 4 Pages

    Cullity argues the conclusion that we should always help others who are in need as long as doing so does not cause significant harm to yourself is too demanding, it seems as though mostly all sources of personal fulfilment would be morally impermissible if the demand to donate to aid agencies were to be fully carried out. If, for example, I wanted to do anything with my free time that involved what could be considered unnecessary spending then this would be considered immoral because theoretically the money you would spend on yourself could have been spent on donating to an aid agency which could use the money to save a child’s life. It is for this reason that Cullity argues in his paper that the Severe Demand can be rejected from an appropriately impart...

    Read More

  • Incentives For Charitable Incentives

    788 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to the Association of Fundraising Professionals, in countries that offer tax breaks for those who make financial donations to charities, the percentage of people who donate is on average 12% higher. Tax incentives also prompt more giving no matter the economic development of the country. No matter how poor or rich the country is, if they offer a tax incentive to those who financially give to charities or non-profits, a higher percentage of individuals donate. Domestically, states have found that restricting or removing existing tax incentives regarding charitable donations significantly decreases the financial support of those charitable

    Read More

  • Peter Singer's The Life You Can Save

    1304 Words  | 3 Pages

    Conversely, in the case of preventing the death of a child in a third world country by donating to a charity, you are more likely prolonging a life for a short period of time rather than truly saving it. Donating money that will be put towards, for example, a malaria net, may prevent someone from passing away due to one illness but it will not give them an education and it will not save them from famine or distress. The donation will only save people in great poverty from one of their many struggles. In the biography “Mountains Beyond Mountains,” Tracy Kidder discusses Paul Farmer’s establishment of the nonprofit, Partners in Health, that obtains donations to its charitable cause from large companies and organizations. These companies and organizations are well-established foundations that can give an amount of money great enough to potentially make a difference and save lives through health care. Nonetheless, even with these great amounts of money, one of Farmer’s patients, John, gets all the medical help possible yet dies anyway. This saddening story exemplifies the point that when donating you cannot guarantee that a life will be saved. The best medical care possible could not save John, so even the best help we can give through charity may not save the people in need. There are many struggles in third-world countries

    Read More

  • Private Property Concepts in the Bible and in Historic Context

    1097 Words  | 3 Pages

    One day, a rich man turned to Jesus and asked him about how to inherit an eternal life. Even though he had already followed the particular commandments such as not murdering, stealing, lying and honoring your parents, he still could not keep the law perfectly. Because Jesus asked him to give all his fortune to the poor but he would not like to. Jesus told disciples that it would be easier for the camel to go through the eye of a needle than the wealthy to enter the Kingdom of God. (Mark 10:17-10:25)

    Read More

  • Quotes Indicating Morality in The Grapes of Wrath

    988 Words  | 2 Pages

    Quote: “If you’re in trouble or hurt or in need-- go to poor people. They’re the only ones that’ll help-- the only ones” (376).

    Read More

  • Beggars, Homeless and the Professional Panhandling Plague

    975 Words  | 2 Pages

    Most people feel that they should help the needy in some way or another. The problem is how to help them. This problem generally arises when there is a person sitting on the side of the road in battered clothes with a cardboard sign asking for some form of help, almost always in the form of money. Yet something makes the giver uneasy. What will they do with this money? Do they need this money? Will it really help them? The truth of the matter is, it won't. However, there are things that can be done to help the needy. Giving money to a reliable foundation will help the helpless, something that transferring money from a pocket to a man's tin can will never do.

    Read More

  • Global Poverty

    570 Words  | 2 Pages

    Peter Singer, in his influential essay “Famine, Affluence and Poverty”, argues that affluent people have the moral obligation to contribute to charity in order to save the poor from suffering; any spending on luxuries would be unjustified as long as it can be used to improve other’s lives. In developing his argument, Singer involves one crucial premise known as the Principle of Sacrifice—“If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it” . To show that such principle has the property to be held universal, Singer refers to a scenario in which a person witnesses a drowning child. Most people, by common sense, hold that the witness has the moral duty to rescue the child despite some potential costs. Since letting people die in poverty is no different from watching a child drowning without offering any help, Singer goes on and concludes that affluent people have the moral duty to keep donating to the poor until an increment of money makes no further contribution.

    Read More

  • Unclean By Richard Beck Disgust

    1107 Words  | 3 Pages

    The rich were the ones that liked the temple system. A system where in order to receive forgiveness one had to pay to be able to participate in the sacrifices. The ones that could afford to do this were the rich, because they had the money. This was not the case of the people that were poor. It was hard for them to get sacrifices, so they were looked at as lesser people in God’s favor. This however is not the case. Jesus came to change this way of thinking. An example of the rich versus poor issue is seen in the story of the wedding feast. The people that came to the wedding at Cana where Jesus performed his first miracle were likely the rich people. The people there at first couldn’t have been poor people, they had to have been rich people. If you were rich, you were able to go to the banquet when it started. The ones that were typically late to banquet were the poorer, working class who had to spend the day working. Thus when the wine ran out at the celebration, it was a big deal because it happened when the richer people were still there and wanting more, when normally the wine wouldn’t run out until near the

    Read More

  • Cyranos De Bergerac Wealth

    1127 Words  | 3 Pages

    Through the eyes of the prosperous, a lack of wealth indicates a fault in character, while their own success is the product of self-control. Paul Buchheit, who analyzed seven different psychological studies in his article titled “Ways the Poor Are More Ethical Than the Rich,” found that “ample evidence exists to show a correlation between wealth and unethical behavior, ...wealth and a lack of empathy for others, and…wealth and unproductiveness” (Buchheit). The relationship between wealth and poor character implies that when people become rich, they start caring more about maintaining their money supply and less about the well-being of others. As wealth increases, generosity, integrity, modesty, and other positive characteristics diminish. Paul Buchheit also noted that “low-income Americans spend a much higher percentage of their income on genuine charitable giving, [with] about two-thirds of ‘charitable’ donations from the rich go[ing] to their foundations and alma maters” (Buchheit). This proves that the wealthy are generally self-absorbed because a large proportion of them, despite having an abundance of money, refrain from devoting it to those in need. When donations are made, it’s only for their own personal benefit. Because the wealthy are programmed to be self-centered, they fail to serve others with their money and instead serve

    Read More

  • Sexism Case Study

    929 Words  | 2 Pages

    While humans are “hardwired to care and help,” there is still a great number of people who have the ability and resources to support their community but do not because they either do not know the needs of their community or they do not know the impact their money or time can make (Kristof and WuDunn 2014:304). Unfortunately, studies have shown that people who are members of the upper class share a significantly smaller portion of their income compared to those who are from the lower- or middle-class. It is important to remember that this does not mean that affluent members of society are greedy or inconsiderate, but rather they are isolated from those in need and therefore may encounter significantly “fewer needy people than the poor, who are surrounded by those in need of a helping hand” (Kristof and WuDunn 2014:304). I believe that regardless of class or social experience, it is important to contribute to the community in whatever way we can, whether that be through donations, volunteering, or advocacy (Kristof and WuDunn 2014). Small actions can make a huge difference in the lives of others and I believe that every citizen is responsible for taking action when and where they

    Read More

  • What Christianity Teaches Us About Human Responsibility Toward the World

    1523 Words  | 4 Pages

    3:17) We are taught to help the poor so that they can continue to live

    Read More

  • Poor Are Better Than Rich

    369 Words  | 1 Pages

    Poor people are filled with hope and the desire to help others that are in need of

    Read More

More about Charity Begins at Home

Open Document