Caspar David Freidrich, By John Constable

1576 Words4 Pages

Throughout, this essay will discuss the paintings of John Constable (The Cornfield), Caspar David Freidrich (Morning in Reisenbirge) and J.M.W Turner (Rain, Steam and Speed) which examplify particular social politics and ideologies of the time, and also how the depiction and vocabulary or visual strategies of landscape have been harnessed by the above mentioned artworks to convey the perspectives, beliefs, ideologies, and politics at that given time.
Landscape can be defined in many ways. The English Dictionary has described landscape as “that portion of land or scenery with which the eye can view at once”. Secondly, dictionaries also state that Landscape is scenery and something to be viewed by the eye, that being the land being seen from a particular perspective. Landscape may also signify to an image of the land. Other dictionaries refer to landscape as a “ ‘scenery’ and that it is not just land itself, but the land as seen from a particular point of view” (Wylie, 2007). In Fine Art, the term landscape defines a piece of land, it portrays a scenic view or views such as seascapes, rivers, forests, mountains, meadows, and hills and so on. This so called landscape may be of a real place or landscape or an imaginary or idealised scene …show more content…

Constable separates himself from the usual river scene to paint a part through the thick forest which leads out to a ripe field of grain. The word grain in England is called “corn” and so hence the name of the painting, The Cornfield. There’s a gradual sense of distant perspective which these days, we are not so fortunate to witness and enjoy. There is a very different suggestion, almost dreamlike which the viewer could imagine themselves gazing across the field and imagining hearing a distant church clock tower ringing in the

Open Document