Cask Of Amontillado Vs Harry Potter Essay

996 Words2 Pages

Harry Potter plays a brilliant protagonist in the Harry Potter series. He makes the reader fear for his life at points, but at others, laugh. Stringing along with the topic of protagonists, Montresor leads the reader through “The Cask of Amontillado”, showing them his reasoning and plan of burying his friend alive, seemingly because of one insult. From “The Most Dangerous Game”, Rainsford shows the readers what he does to live in the three days that he is given in order to win “the most dangerous game”. After reading both short stories and comparing them, Montresor’s character plays a better protagonist than Rainsford. A protagonist should be able to convey the information that needs to be given in a way that allows the reader to understand what’s going on whilst making the reader want to know more. With Montresor, the information is expressed in …show more content…

While the reader has been informed that Fortunato, Montresor’s friend, said something that triggered Montresor, the reader doesn’t know what was said. The reader also doesn’t know what’s about to happen to Fortunato exactly, though can predict that something tragic is going to happen to Fortunato at some point from the use of the word immolation, meaning death or destruction, meaning death or destruction, the reader doesn’t know just how, exactly, the immolation is going to happen. On the contrary, in “The Most Dangerous Game”, almost everything that the reader needs to know is laid out in front of them, whether it be Rainsford processing information or him expressing it in some form or another. The reader is given the information that “I give him [the player] three hours’ start… If my quarry eludes me [Zaroff] for three whole days, he wins the game. If I find him he loses.” During the game, Rainsford explains all his traps and techniques, such as “[he] struck off from the rude

Open Document