More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical appreciation of the story the cask of amontillado
Plot Of The Story The Cask Of Amontillado
The Most Dangerous Game Analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
My Favorite Story. . .So Far After having read the stories “The Most Dangerous Game” and “The Cask of Amontillado”, “The Most Dangerous Game” is my favorite of the two. Although Edgar Allan Poe is the more famous author, Richard Connell’s story made me think more deeply than did Poe’s story. General Zaroff , in the end, got what he wanted; he won the game. In contrast, Poe’s story held few surprises for this reader. The “thousand injuries of Fortunato” was the only element that befuddled me throughout the story. Montresor never explained the ways in which Fortunato so maligned him or, possibly, the family Montresor so that the narrator’s only recourse was to murder Fortunato in such a malicious, calculated manner. On the other hand, Connell’s
In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game”, he uses several literary devices to keep the reader interested. During Rainsfords journey to and through the island of General Zaroff he partakes in an adventurous journey filled with mystery, suspense, and dilemma. These devices are used to keep the reader interested throughout the story.
Has a Story ever made a reader want to hurt the character responsible for trouble that’s being caused? Of course; usually the antagonist is often the nuisance. Richard Connell creates these instigative characters with pleasure and diversity. In his story “The Most Dangerous Game”, He Creates General Zaroff so that he is easy to hold a grudge against. Likewise Edgar Allan Poe Creates a character that is easy to hate. In his short story “The Cask of Amontillado”, Poe creates a mastermind killer. Connells antagonist, General Zaroff, and Poe’s antagonist, Montresor, give the reader an invitation to hate them. These two characters are similar yet different in their evil persona, wealth, and challenge.
In Summary, both stories were interesting enough to hold the attentiveness of a devout reader. Though they weren’t identical in every element, they both held similarities that contributed to the reader becoming engulfed with eagerness to continue reading. “The Destructors” by Graham Greene and “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell reveal similarities in both conflict, and brilliant use of suspense in a ploy to keep the reader engaged.
Realism is a style of literature in which familiar aspects of life are represented in a straightforward or plain manner. In “The Most Dangerous Game,” Richard Connell uses realistic ways of writing to criticize realistic ideas of people at the time. Connell uses dominant mood, setting and naturalism to help create suspense and expand the story. Connell uses historic events such as Darwinism, big game hunting, and Russian Civil War to criticize the ideas of people in that time period. This time period helped Connell write a story where he could criticize a lot of what people thought.
The conflict of good and evil presents itself in “The Most Dangerous Game” and “The Child by Tiger” in two completely different ways. One story being commercial fiction and the other being literary fiction, there are many ways of viewing variables such as good versus evil, realistic versus unrealistic stories and moral significance. The stories have different voices and are meant for different audiences, but in viewing the overall moral importance of both fictional works, the story with a greater moral significance is “The Child by Tiger”.
A man who would never commit murder ends up murdering someone else, and another man bloodthirsty for revenge murders someone close to them. Rainsford from “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell and Montresor from “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe are both characters who are felonious because they murdered someone. They are both main characters who were experiencing strange choices, having to kill someone, and to carefully planning through details to reach their goal. However, one man never thought he would kill someone, but the other man, bloodthirsty.
People are killed every day, so why do two more people make a difference? “The Cask of Amontillado,” and “The Most Dangerous Game” both focus on characters who have been wronged, and want revenge. I do believe Fortunato, and General Zaroff deserved to die. In the stories, “The Cask of Amontillado,” and “The Most Dangerous Game” the characters Montresor, and Rainsford are justified in taking another human’s life for revenge.
Many readers will be entertained by the sinister and frightening settings, characters, and foreshadowing used in both stories, “The Cask of Amontillado” and “The Most Dangerous Game”. In both Richard Connell's “The Most Dangerous Game” and Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado,” the setting is very unappealing and frightening. However, the authors do this to engage readers and make them want to hear more about this creepy place. By looking at each creepy setting that each author includes throughout the story, readers can chose which seems more enjoyable to them.
How often is a story read, without the reader fully comprehending what the story's meaning or message is trying to convey? With the use of literary elements, it helps the reader understand the story. To begin, literary elements like situational irony, dramatic characterization, and mood are used in a writing to help interest the reader, connect with the characters, or discover the theme in a short story. First, in "The Cask of Amontillado", "The Necklace", and "The Sniper", situational irony draws a reader's attention and makes the stories livelier. Second, the dramatic characterization in "The Destructors", "Marigolds" and "A Haunted House" aids the reader in connecting with the characters to understand the stories. Third, the moods of "The Pedestrian", "The Rocking-Horse Winner", and "Repent Harlequin Said the Ticktockman" reflect the theme of the story for the reader to determine from the work. Once again, the use of literary elements in a short story contributes to the reader's
In Edgar Allen Poe’s gothic story, The Cask of Amontillado, He uses many fears to make the reader very scared. To do so, he uses a lot of imagery, tone, and mood in his writing to make you feel as if you are in the same setting as the characters. In this particular story he makes the antagonist also the narrator, seem nice in the beginning, then he gives him more flare and make him go crazy towards the fortunato, murdering him. The fortunato was his old friend at the carnival, who was to taste a wine for him. In the story Poe uses these primal fears to make it more exciting, and it sure works.
The setting in the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” has many similarities and differences to the setting in “The Interlopers”. Though the settings differ in many ways, for example the danger of them and their contents, they are also similar in their mystery and vitality to the plot. These two pieces of writing hold many of the same ideas, but they also are original works that portray them in their own way.
Stories with an eerie and creepy tone almost always attract attention. In Edgar Allen Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado,” Montresor reaches his breaking point when Fortunato insults him, so he tricks Fortunato with his weakness, wine. Fortunato drinks too much, just as Montresor devised, and he leads Fortunato down to the catacombs. There in the catacombs, Montresor carries out his revenge on Fortunato by chaining him and then building a brick wall around him. The setting in “The Cask of Amontillado” affects the reader’s assumptions, mood, and senses during the story, enhancing the eerie, yet somehow humerus, tone.
All around it was quiet. [ADM2]The birds were chirping and the leaves were blowing. Suddenly, a man fled from the brush, holding only a knife in his right hand. After the fleeing man had ran some distance, another man came out of the brush holding a revolver. This man walked calmly after the fleeing man not worried that the he would escape. The old, erect man stopped, and loaded his revolver. He then took aim, shot a round and hit the fleeing man just as he turned around. The man dropped as he died instantly. The old man then walked over to the game he had just killed, grabbed the body by the shirt, and dragged the body into the brush. Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game is a story based on a man who thrives for hunting humans[ADM3]. The way Connell wrote this short story reveals some characteristics about him. The Most Dangerous Game is a psychological story about the author facing and overcoming fear.
The Case of Amontallido In a psychological perspective, the author’s life is linked with the behavior and motivations of characters in the story. The author’s name is Edgar Allan’s Poe who portrayed his self in his writing. The miserable life of Poe can be measured through “The Cask of Amontillado” in which character named “Montressor” showed indifferent feeling towards his victim. After burying Fortunado alive, Montressor felt bad after burying his victim alive but then he attributes the feeling of guilt to the damp catacombs.
Edgar Allen Poe’s tale of murder and revenge, “The Cask of Amontillado”, offers a unique perspective into the mind of a deranged murderer. The effectiveness of the story is largely due to its first person point of view, which allows the reader a deeper involvement into the thoughts and motivations of the protagonist, Montresor. The first person narration results in an unbalanced viewpoint on the central conflict of the story, man versus man, because the reader knows very little about the thoughts of the antagonist, Fortunato. The setting of “The Cask of Amontillado”, in the dark catacombs of Montresor’s wine cellar, contributes to the story’s theme that some people will go to great lengths to fanatically defend their honor.