Can Woman Really Fly?

1197 Words3 Pages

Can Woman Really Fly? There are many readings that easily correlate in the long history of atomic weaponry, but the one article that stood out in terms of its context would be Joseph J. Corn article entitles Making Flying “Thinkable”: Women Pilots and the Selling of Aviation. Unlike the others readings, like that from Bush and Rentezi, Corn’s article correlates more to aviation than the atom. The main point of Corn’s article is that women were extremely important in terms of aviation and without there involvement aviation would not be what it is today. This main point is expressed by a quote from Corn in the last paragraph of the article, “women pilots of the late twenties and thirties was the first to render the sky friendly and hospitable” (Joseph J. Corn, Making Flying “Thinkable”: Women Pilots and the Selling of Aviation, 1979, pg. 571). This main point is then strongly represented by primary sources stating what women did in terms of selling aviation to the mass public, dealing with female discrimination, and how they forfeit being aviators to a more feminist role, so as to allow aviation to grow. These primary sources makes the main point look very effective in terms of showing the audience the importance of women in aviation since the audience get to see the how the aviation world was prior and after female involvement. In Corn’s article he expresses three central points in his article to help support his main point; those points being how aviation was before women’s involvement, how the aviation world changed with women’s involvement, and finally women sacrifice to make aviation what it is today. In Joseph Corn’s first point, in terms of supporting his main point, he expresses how av... ... middle of paper ... ...never existing or being hard to find. All three of Corn’s point really helps the reader to see that women really did play a key role in terms of making increasing aviation use. Corn splits the article into three separate points in which the audience sees how aviation was before female interaction, during female interaction, and after. He then presents the reader with a long list of primary sources, mostly from magazines and female aviators, to help convince the audience that his main point is valid. In the most part, the only weakness seen from Corn’s article is his lack of numerical proof that female aviators helped increase aviation and that some of Corn’s primary sources are from anonymous people, but looking beyond that we can see that Corn makes a compelling argument in representing female’s participation in the aviation world in the late 1920s and 30s.

Open Document