Bushido Samurai Analysis

2002 Words5 Pages

Bushido or the way of the samurai introduces samurai as both men of culture and as warriors. The art and culture of samurai encompasses more than 800 years of Japans history as well as its creative past. From the 12th century through the modernization of Japan.
Bushido is art because art can be interpreted as in many ways such as art is something people create to express something or ideas, or it can be interpreted as another form for the art of war, or perhaps as a fine art in of itself. Samurai have many connections to art such as calligraphy, painting, their armor which was meant to show their power and evoke fear, their swords which instantly identified them as a samurai and a follower of Bushido, and poetry most famous were the death poems …show more content…

Just as Tsunetomo wanted to harmonize the ways of the first samurai with the more aristocratic samurai in the Tokugawa period Inazo Nitobe attempted to harmonize Bushido overall with western civilization. Nitobes new version of bushido draws parallels between Bushido as code of ethics to that of chivalry in Europe and Christianity. “Bushido, then, is the code of moral principles which the knights were required or instructed to observe.” (Nitobe 1). Nitobe later describes Bushido as a force in Japan, that it is the “motor force of our country, he says that it was Bushido that guided Japan forward. This further solidifies the position that just as how Western civilization can be based off Christianity, Japanese society is based off Bushido thus Japans society and identity itself is and always has been …show more content…

Mishima states that absolute loyalty to death must be worked on every day. This view of Bushido is very distinct apart from Nitobe’s version of Bushido that acts as a ‘motor’ for Japan. The translator for Mishima’s Hagakure (bushido) writes “ Mishima draws parallels between the moral decay of Jocho’s day and that of postwar Japan explaining how bushido advice has helped him live an anachronistic and therefore worthwhile life.” (Sparling ix). Mishima saw bushido as a reason to live in anarchy but Nitobe saw Bushido as a social entity that drives Japan forward. The difference between these interpretations shows the change of how Bushido is viewed over time and changing

Open Document