Bruno Bettelheim: Disturbed, Debunked, Defamed

Bruno Bettelheim, Austrian-American psychologist and author, devoted the large part of his life to studying human development—most notably the individual’s early growth, response to trauma, and long-term effects of various forms of repression upon the natural ego. His was the foremost scientific mind in child psychology of the post-World War II era, and his extensive theories regarding the power of fairy tales to provide insight into the “inner life of children” suggest that fairy tales confront juvenile issues in such metaphorical terms as to make them more readily universally accessible to children and therefore more resolvable. However, as assertive as Bettelheim’s arguments are and as all-encompassing his studies of the child psyche may appear to be, his career is not completely clear of spark controversies and questions of both academic and personal integrity. Ultimately, even if Bettelheim’s work were to be considered on account of its own merit alone, the detrimental effects of his own traumatic—and subsequently dissolute—life experiences on that work must not be overlooked. Thus although it is arguable that Bruno Bettelheim’s contribution to anthropology was indeed sizable, his theories as to the “uses of enchantment” are too personally biased and subject/vulnerable to critical censure to be considered applicable to any practical extent in the field of child psychology today.

Any biographical research of Bruno Bettelheim will yield results teeming with critical discretion regarding his work. Some general, highly publicized, and widely spread controversies shadow his greater contributions to psychology to an extent that his career has really come to be defined by the inadequacy with which he conducted his academic findings...

... middle of paper ...

...d the Fairy Tales." Children's Literature: Annual

of The Modern Language Association Group on Children's Literature and The Children's Literature Association 6 (1977): 93-114. Rpt. in Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. James P. Draper and Jennifer Allison Brostrom. Vol. 79. Detroit: Gale Research, 1994. Literature Resources from Gale. Web. 11 Mar. 2010.

Nussbaum, Emily. "Defending Dr. B. Bruno Bettelheim was a complicated man, but not

an evil one, his agent insists." The New York Times Book Review 24 Nov. 2002: 16+. Literature Resources from Gale. Web. 11 Mar. 2010.

Roazen, Paul. "The Rise and Fall of Bruno Bettelheim." Psychohistory Review: Studies of

Motivation in History and Culture 20.3 (Spring 1992): 221-250. Rpt. in Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism. Ed. Janet Witalec. Vol. 143. Detroit: Gale, 2004. Literature Resources from Gale. Web. 11 Mar. 2010.