Boston Reentry Initiative Essay

795 Words2 Pages

Noah Vasquez

The Boston Reentry Initiative program was created due to a wave of violence that purged the streets of Boston neighborhoods. In early 2000, Boston crime rates surged in almost every major category; aggravated assault, robbery and rape. This surge was occurring mainly in minority neighborhoods, which are categorized as high impact areas due to the susceptibility to crime caused by poverty and unemployment. During these times, there was also a 13% spike in firearm related crimes. The police commissioner did an analysis of the crimes and concluded that the cause of the violent crimes was mainly due to ex-offenders that returned home from the Suffolk County House of Corrections and committed more violent crimes upon their reintegration …show more content…

The police commissioner sought to reduce the number of violent offenders and so called Superintendent Joyce to arm a joint law enforcement and community effort to aid in the fight against rising crime rates. The Boston Reentry Initiative was designed to ease the transition process for these high risk violent offenders at the Suffolk county house of corrections back into boston communities. Their goals were to reduce the rate of recidivism and give aid and support to ex criminals. Recidivism is the rate at which people who finish their sentences at a correctional facility later commit another crime upon reentering society that lands them back in jail. In order to give these individuals the support they needed so they would not become repeat offenders, the program provided mentors, case managers, social workers and vocational development workers to aid in the reintegration of …show more content…

One being to focus on giving serious returning offenders resources that they could need, such as these caseworkers, workshops and open discussions. Second was to provide a public safely and social service approach. Creating alliances between community providers and law enforcement. Third was an intervention service, that was individualized to each offender. A panel discussion would be hosted within 45 days of an inmate’s entrance to the correctional facility. This panel was mostly law enforcement and crim agencies speaking about recidivism. Then, case workers and mentors from mostly faith based organizations like the ones listed above would work one on one with individuals and enumerate the resources that would be provided to them after release. They would develop transition plans with the individual and outline the services that could be provided if they agreed to enter the program. Services were mental health, substance abuse intervention, career counseling, job placement workshops, educational programs and transportation information. The inmate was given individual presentations by members that warned them about the consequences of returning to jail after being released. This panel and discussion was aimed at delivering support, and not accusing the individual, which made it unique to the programs out there. The panelists would pledge to help, and as esteemed leaders of these communities, at times ex

Open Document