Bonk: A curious Coupling of Science and Sex

994 Words2 Pages

"Bonk: A curious Coupling of Science and Sex" begins with the beginnings of the study of sex, starting with our attempts to learn about human sex from animal sex. She makes sure to cover the most important researchers and the critique that the public held. Roach (2008) proceeded to talk about the processes that Masters and Johnson used to start understanding the female orgasm, which led her to question if and why women can achieve orgasm from a robotic piston. Afterward, she covers some myths, one of which was started by Napoleon's Great-Granddaughter, about female sex (Roach, 2008). The most common myth that was covered was that women whose clitoris is more than an inch from their urethra are hard challenged to reach climax (Roach, 2008). After that, Roach (2008) covers the thought that if the female obtains an orgasm, there is a higher chance that she will become pregnant. In chapter five, Roach (2008) discusses coital imaging, and even discusses her own experience with it. For a few chapters after this, she covers male impotence, including potential cures for erectile dysfunction, be it surgical or with implants, Testicular grafts, and Penile transplants (Roach, 2008). In chapter 9, Roach (2008) explains the mindset that states that the clitoris is a biologically under-developed penis. She then talks about a highly touchy topic, pardon the pun: masturbation, or namely the potential health benefits of masturbation (Roach, 2008). After that, she covers several curious cases of orgasm that occur either in the handicapped, on places that are not erogenous, or even in the dead (Roach, 2008). She later covers the mental disconnect in terms of sexual arousal. She then covers the vaginal reflexes in sex, as well as the works of a man n...

... middle of paper ...

...nowledge and thoughts about human behavior in regards to sex, I fear that I did not learn much of anything new. For most of my life, I knew that humans were animals, with the desire to procreate being only diminished by our desire for following the norms of society; I also knew that sex was pleasurable, admittedly not from first-hand experience, but the point still stands. While my knowledge has been tested slightly, I still find these basic principles of human nature to stand firm. Putting these two factors together, even in my adolescence, made me draw the conclusion that people had sex because it was fun, but they didn't talk about it because it could be embarrassing. If Mary Roach has mentioned anything different, then I fear I missed her words.

Works Cited

Roach, M. (2008). Bonk: The curious coupling of science and sex. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

More about Bonk: A curious Coupling of Science and Sex

Open Document