Biological Themes In The Film 'On Golden Pond'

1484 Words3 Pages

On Golden Pond – Late Adulthood
1.Asses and discuss the biological/physiological aspects of Norman Thayer. Consider health, physical disabilities and genetic issues.
2.Describe Norman’s attachment style toward his wife, Ethel Thayer and his daughter Chelsea Thayer.
3.Describe the differences in the way Norman and Ethel Thayer face the aging process. What factors might contribute to these differences? On Golden Pond is a film that depicts aging, vulnerabilities, and challenges as it illustrates the familial and intergenerational themes that we have discussed. Norman Thayler is an 80-year-old man who is married to Ethel Thaylerr for nearly 50 years. They have a 42-year old daughter Chelsea, who is estranged from her father. Norman suffers with …show more content…

Miller discuses many themes concerning death and illness. It has come to be that society view illness as a time of suffering and burden, where families and individuals are afraid of becoming sick with a chronic illness because of all the pain and suffering that comes along with it. Illness has become about prolonging life with a multitude of excess problems and a more painful life. Families and caregivers become overburdened while the patient suffers while wishing their illness to be anything but a burden to their caregivers. Death in our society is viewed very differently to different people within different settings. In a hospital for instance, death is treated as an emptiness. The existence of bright rooms, white floors, machines ringing, and tied up tubes as a patient dies is very mechanical and represents a businesslike experience as the patient is immediately forgotten after they die while their bodies are quickly shuffled out the door to make room for the next chronically ill patient. Society today views death and illness with unease and apprehension because of the fear around it where people view the hospital environment as a place for acute trauma and illness not a place of healing where one can die with dignity. On the other hand, death in places like Dr. Millers Zen Hospital have developed rituals around topic so when a patient dies there is recognition of the patient’s individuality as a human being. The Zen hospital’s rituals involve …show more content…

Rather it provides a system that is inhumane revolved around curing which prolongs death, producing suffering and chronic illness. The influx of people that will flood the healthcare system will need specialized medical care as the healthcare industry continues to prolong life. Dr. Miller discusses how an infrastructure is needed to help this population manage living longer with chronic illness. What is needed is a system that accepts and affirms death while catering to the emotional and personal needs of the individual as they die. I believe what he is saying is to show the individual and their body better respect during their detachment with life. This will impact the individual because it will create a system that is revolved around care and comfort allowing life to play itself out without the pain and suffering which will help to cure the stigma around death. Dr. Miller talks about how comfort is a necessary part of death just like food and shelter is a necessary part of life. He discusses ideas around redesigning death, how the senses should be integrated into illness and death so that individuals become more connected to life. Becoming more comfortable around the idea instead of being afraid of suffering by treating the person and not the disease leaving hospitals for a place to heal not a place to live and

Open Document