Benjamin Franklin Rhetorical Analysis

727 Words2 Pages

The appeal of Benjamin Franklin about the Constitution displayed uncommon styles to help get his idea into the minds of others. Benjamin Franklin thoroughly explains what the Constitution does for people and why it has faults. By combining positives and negatives, Benjamin Franklin is able to bring confusion to the reader which may sometimes allow that specific individual to conceive an entirely different opinion. From his speech, we can find numerous sentences that support his own opinion and yet we can also find sentences that explain the opposite of his appeal. Not everyone has the same mindset and I believe that Benjamin Franklin used his specific style in order to cause readers to think for themselves instead of using the opinion stated. …show more content…

Benjamin Franklin includes that our enemies will be surprised and confused to learn that our states are on the point of separation. Without unity, the government loses power and the general public doesn’t help improve the nation. Ben Franklin says in third paragraph that, “ we - only meet hereafter for the purpose of cutting one another’s throat.” The differences that pull people apart must be corrected with the help of possibly improving our nation’s constitution. It shows that we must strive to unite with each other in order to thrive as a prosperous …show more content…

In the second paragraph, he questions that with an assembly of men, can a perfect production be expected to be made. Not being firm in his own opinion only combats the statements made about the faults. Readers would base their opinions off of his which may be misleading. Although he believes that the Constitution needs changes, he also presumes that it is at the highest state of perfection it will ever be able to achieve. Although, Ben Franklin wants people to see the faults through the exploitation of revealing the benefits of having the

Open Document